Join Bridge Winners
4 (4 over 3) as ace asking after a preempt, teaching this to serious aft duplicate club players, good idea or not ?

The level is studious club players who never heard of intra finesse & have a really hard time with restricted choice. They all underestimate the values of aces for slams no matter how often I repeat it. They do quite well with Drury/bergen raise/inverted minors raises/smolen (maybe its because im not the one who have teach them those. Embarassed

I teach them and they understand that 4Nt is only RKC if a suit is agreed and a kibbitzer who doesnt see any cards know what trump is.

Their cuebid for controls is pretty good and they know that

1M-2Y-3M (2Y=GF, 3M show a suit good enough that its trumps)

1M-1NT-4Y (auto splinter)

4M-(P)-4Nt

 So on these they know that 4NT or a delayed 4Nt is RKC in opener M)

 

Should I teach them to use 4 as RKC over 2 and 3 level preempt ? (4 over 3 preempt, no modified responses)

Should I teach them to use 4 as RKC when is trumps (at their level it seem that its not rare that 2+Q isnt enough).

Yes to both.
Yes for 4 RKC, no for 4 as RKC
No for 4 RKC, yes for 4 as RKC
no for both

Sorry, to answer polls. Registered users can vote in polls, and can also browse other users' public votes! and participate in the discussion.

Getting results...
loading...
14 Comments
Getting Comments... loading...
.

Bottom Home Top