Join Bridge Winners
ACBL General Convention Chart Question

This is a somewhat esoteric convention chart question, so I'd guess most people don't know the answer any better than I do, but I figure someone may. I've been contemplating trying a "NT preempt" third seat white, showing a balanced hand with 8-13 HCP. This agreement is GCC legal with the caveat that there may not be any conventional responses, etc. This isn't such a big deal in this context, as our side is very unlikely to have game, and many (or at least some) of the semi-balanced hands will select a different call than the NT preempt opening; opening semi-balanced 5 card weak twos is generally acceptable in our methods third seat white, for example. In general, natural "to play" responses seem like they'd work fine. The biggest problem I see with the treatment is: 1) potential damage to strong NT auctions, and 2) runout legality. I've given some thought to 1) and I think it's workable; basically just move everything down half a point. So the biggest problem is 2); I'd expect to be doubled for penalties fairly frequently playing this treatment, so it seems necessary to have a decent runout system. The GCC seems fairly clear (at least how I read it) that conventional bids may not be used as a defense to an opponent's conventional defense to one's ultra-light or wide-ranging (or dual-range) NT opening. The other seemingly-relevant GCC provision is a blanket statement allowing conventional doubles and redoubles in (almost?) all auctions.

Competitive

CONVENTIONAL DOUBLES AND REDOUBLES and responses
(including free bids) thereto.

Disallowed

CONVENTIONAL RESPONSES, REBIDS AND A CONVENTIONAL
DEFENSE TO AN OPPONENT’S CONVENTIONAL DEFENSE after
natural notrump opening bids or overcalls with a lower limit of fewer than 10
HCP or with a range of greater than 5 HCP (including those that have two
non-consecutive ranges)

http://www.acbl.org/assets/documents/play/Convention-Chart.pdf

So the question is: What runout systems are GCC legal after 1NT (8-13)-(x)-?

One relevant question is how a penalty double should be classifed...it's not exactly a 'conventional defense'. My reading of the GCC is that a conventional redouble would be allowed in this context and all other calls must be natural, but I'm not very confident in my interpretation.

I am confident that all typical runout methods are GCC legal in this context
I am confident that a conventional redouble is allowed, but everything else must be natural
I am confident that nothing conventional is allowed; xx must be business, P 'to play', 2x = x
I'm not sure, but I think all typical runout methods are GCC legal in this context
I'm not sure, but I think that only a conventional redouble is allowed
I'm not sure, but I don't think anything conventional is allowed
I have no idea

Sorry, to answer polls. Registered users can vote in polls, and can also browse other users' public votes! and participate in the discussion.

Getting results...
loading...
28 Comments
Getting Comments... loading...
.

Bottom Home Top