Join Bridge Winners
Corrected score?

South
107643
J2
AK1043
8
W
N
E
S
2
X
2
3
P
3
P
3
P
3NT
P
P
P

2 was alerted and correctly explained as WT in or any strong 2-suiter. 2 was alerted and correctly explained as no game opposite WT, opps asking if P would show which was denied. P was alerted and explained as WT. 3 was alerted and explained as stopper ask. Before the lead pard asked about 3, which was explained as forcing, nothing further. 3N made, but we could have taken the first 5 tricks after a lead. Declarer had 3 small. After asking why 3 was not alerted, opps explained that is a forcing bid.

TD was called and situation explained. TDs commented that he considered 3 a psyche, result stands.

i should add that opps play 2 as WT in or strong, so they are familiar with this type of 2-way-bids.

Result should be corrected to 3N-1
TD is right, no correction
Another TD might correct, but is not clear cut

Sorry, to answer polls. Registered users can vote in polls, and can also browse other users' public votes! and participate in the discussion.

Getting results...
loading...
23 Comments
Getting Comments... loading...
.

Bottom Home Top