Join Bridge Winners
Different Defenses Against No Trump in Direct vs. Balancing Seats?

Hi all.  So one concept I have come across as I have been studying bridge bidding is that it seems some expert pairs choose to differentiate not just the defense they use against 1NT openings based on the range of said openings (weak vs. strong) but also based on whether the (potential) overcaller is in the direct seat as opposed to the "passout" or balancing seat.

This leads me to my poll question to members of the BW community: Do any of you all, with at least some partners, use a different defense against NT in the direct seat than in the balancing seat?  If so, what different systems do you use?  Does this vary by the strength of opener's 1NT?  What is your reasoning behind doing it?

Genuinely curious to hear thoughts on this.  Thanks!

PS- Note the wording of the choices I have listed.  Many of you may vary the particular defense against 1NT openings that you use depending on who you're playing with (for instance, I have some partners with whom I play DONT even though I have a strong preference for Woolsey, but I digress).  That's not what I am asking about.  I am particularly interested in whether any of you play in partnerships that vary the system of defense against 1NT openings based on position.  Hope this clarifies any confusion :).

With one or more of my partners, I use a different system for defending against 1NT openings when I am sitting in the direct seat than when I am sitting in the balancing seat.
Regardless of who I am playing with, I do not vary my system for defending against 1NT openings based on whether I am sitting in the direct seat as opposed to the balancing seat.

Sorry, to answer polls. Registered users can vote in polls, and can also browse other users' public votes! and participate in the discussion.

Getting results...
loading...
31 Comments
Getting Comments... loading...
.

Bottom Home Top