Browse hands and analyses from The Common Game, a free service where bridge clubs play identical hands and compare results across North America.
Join Bridge Winners
Print Gargoyle Chronicles - Event 3, Match 6, Board 8 by Phillip Martin July 2, 2012

gargoyle

Board 8
Neither vulnerable

 

We're down 5 IMPs going into the last board of the match. I pick up:

Phillip
AQJ3
Q97654
75
3

This hand, with 10 cards in the majors and 6 losers, is a 1 opening in my opinion. I suspect my counterpart at the other table will not agree, so we would have an opportunity for a swing if I were in first seat. Unfortunately, I'm in fourth seat. LHO opens 1, partner passes, and RHO bids 2 (not game-forcing).

My choices are 2 or double. Double brings spades into the picture. But that's not probably not important unless partner has five spades. A six-two heart fit rates to play better than a four-four spade fit, especially given that my hearts are weak. I bid 2.

LHO raises to 3, and partner bids 3. RHO bids 4.

Partner should have at most two cover cards for his single raise. So 4 seems like a poor proposition. I pass. LHO and partner pass also. I lead the 7 (third best from an even number).


Phillip
AQJ3
Q97654
75
3
Thomas
98
J10
KQ10642
AK7
W
N
E
S
1
P
2
2
3
3
4
P
P
P

Partner plays the K, and declarer wins the A. Does this mean declarer has another heart? Partner knows I have six hearts. He might duck with Kxxx to advise me we don't have any heart tricks. Then again, perhaps he can't afford to do that. I might underlead the A if I needed a quick spade shift, especially since I wouldn't expect declarer to have the K after he gave up on 3NT.

Partner can have at most one more cover card for his raise. If he has the K, we aren't beating this. I must hope partner has the A, in which case we can take a diamond, two spades, and possibly a heart. Make that probably a heart. With Kxxx and an ace, partner might have raised to 4 rather than to 3.

Declarer plays the 2 to the ace; partner plays the 5. Declarer leads a low club from dummy to his Q, partner following with the 9. I doubt declarer would have bid 4 with a five-card suit. But I can't be sure whether he has six or seven. Since I want partner to switch to a spade when he gets in with the A, I pitch a heart (the 6). A spade discard would suggest I want to cash my Q.

Declarer plays the 3; I play the 7. Partner captures dummy's Q with the A and shifts to the J. Partner must have the J to be doing this. I'm glad he overrode my request for a spade shift. This will work out better. With dummy's diamonds out of the picture, we will hold declarer to six clubs, one heart, and one diamond: down two.

What should I discard? A spade pitch might enable declarer to establish a long spade trick if he has four spades. Not that that's likely. He would probably have bid 3 rather than 4 if he did. But I'd rather not make any assumptions I don't have to.

The danger in keeping all my spades is that I may get endplayed if declarer is 3-2-2-6. Will that happen? Declarer can cash a diamond, ruff a diamond, and play trumps. His last five cards will be three spades, a heart, and a club. If I keep three spades and two hearts, declarer can play a heart. I win and tap him. Now a low spade endplays me. To prevent that, I must keep three hearts and two spades. If declarer cashes the last trump, I can simply pitch the Q and claim the balance.

So I must keep three hearts, but I don't need four. I can pitch a heart on this trick. After that, I must pitch spades.

I pitch the 5. Declarer cashes the Q--9--8--5. Instead of ruffing a diamond to his hand and hoping I sleepily pitch another heart, he leads the 8--2--7. Apparently he has K10 and is hoping partner has QJ. I win with the jack and lead the Q. Declarer follows. I tap declarer with a heart and score two more spade tricks. Down two.

Phillip
AQJ3
Q97654
75
3
Thomas
98
J10
KQ10642
AK7
Jack
6542
K32
AJ9
J95
Adrian
K107
A8
83
Q108642
D
8

We can actually make 4! Partner covers two of my six losers, and the spade finesse covers a third. This is an exceedingly lucky lie of the cards, so I don't regret not bidding game. I needed RHO to have the K to have a chance. If LHO had it or even if partner had it (leaving him with at most one more cover card), I would have four losers. So game was something less than 33% on the information I had.

I assume we've lost the match. It's hard to see how we're going to pick up 5 IMPs. Our teammates need a plus score, and there aren't many plus scores available to them on this board. But surprise! Our teammates come through. They score +400 in 3NT. I'm not sure how that happened. Perhaps West was on lead and tried the Q? In any event, we pick up 11 IMPs to win the match by 6, giving us 17 out of 30 victory points.

Table 1: +100
Table 2: +400

Score on Board 8: +11 IMPs
Result on Match 6: +6 IMPs (17 VP)
Current Total: 109 VP (out of 180)

Gargoyle Chronicles (56 Subscribers)
Phillip Martin
Phillip Martin
  • 15
    Following
  • 95
    Followers
  • 84
    Posts
  • 48
    Favorites
Phillip Martin lives in Scarsdale, New York. He is the Chief Technology Officer for Gargoyle Strategic Investments in Englewood, New Jersey. He is also a composer, currently serving as Composer-in-Residence for Hartford Opera Theater. While he retired from tournament play some twenty years ago to pursue other interests, he has remained active in bridge as a writer, contributing occasional articles to The Bridge World and Bridge Today and publishing a bridge blog, The Gargoyle Chronicles.
Comments (5)
Getting Comments... loading...
.