Join Bridge Winners
Multi went for -1100. Worst bid?

The following occurred during last Sunday night's practice match on BBO between the USBF U26-1 and  U26-2 teams traveling in August to China. In a hard fought 15 board contest, they played to a 23-23 tie. Look out, here we come. Here is board four.

West
KQxxxx
A10x
Q
xxx
North
Jx
KQxx
AKx
AQJx
East
10
Jxx
J987xx
xxx
South
A98x
xxx
10xx
Kxx
W
N
E
S
2
X
P
P
2
X
P
P
P
D
2X West
NS: 0 EW: 0

When the smoke cleared, West was down four, -1100.

East-West agreed to play a weak 2D multi (no strong option), with "sound preempts" when vulnerable. North's first double showed a weak notrump or a big hand. East's pass of the double suggested playing in diamonds.

(I don't know what N-S agreements were after West bid 2S. Once South converted North's double to penalties, should they be in a force? (I think not.) Once South converted North's double, should subsequent doubles be penalty? (I think yes. I observe that ACBL standard defenses do not address these continuations.) Appreciate thoughts on that.)

At the other table, West opened 1S and N-S bid DBL-1N-3N attaining the normal result. If West had opened a weak 2S bid, North would double and South would ???

What was the worst bid?

No one did anything wrong.
West should have opened 1S, sound weak two bid be damned.
North should not have doubled 2S on SJx.
East should have better diamonds for his pass. (E-W agreement is RDB picks a major)
South's pass of 2D was reckless and irresponsible, a bid only a junior might make. (I love the pass chosen by a regular on this show, initials O.K.)
West should have sat for 2Dx with a singleton DQ. E-W would probably escape for -800.
Other.

Sorry, to answer polls. Registered users can vote in polls, and can also browse other users' public votes! and participate in the discussion.

Getting results...
loading...
54 Comments
Getting Comments... loading...
.

Bottom Home Top