Join Bridge Winners
National Champions in Limited Events: Fair or Foul?

I never thought I'd be writing a poll on this, but thanks to my partner stepping in while I was going full Jean van de Velde in the final session of the NAPs the other day, I am technically a national champion (no, this does not make me World Class as per Dave Caprera's poll that's also trending; I am perfectly fine accepting that I'm "not awful"). Anyways, I heard from a friend that there was a recent motion passed in Honolulu that prevents national champions (only applies to Open events) from entering limited events. I confirmed with a director that this is the case effective January 1, 2020.


I understand why the board passed a motion like this: they want to prevent Open event winners from entering limited events and potentially stealing the opportunity for someone else to win. However, I do feel like this is a bit harsh, especially for someone like myself. I only have 2400 points and will not be competitive in a "more serious" national event anytime soon (you can check my Platinum Pairs results from yesterday to confirm that) and while I have no problem entering in those events for the experience of playing in top-notch competition, I do enjoy playing with friends in limited events if we want to do so. Being that I'm also a Junior, I'm not even eligible for every event out there, so preventing me from entering additional events further limits what I can enter.


Therefore, I ask: national champions playing in limited events - fair or foul?

Fair but the only limited events that national champions should be allowed to enter are 0-10K events

Sorry, to answer polls. Registered users can vote in polls, and can also browse other users' public votes! and participate in the discussion.

Getting results...
Getting Comments... loading...

Bottom Home Top