Join Bridge Winners
Ruling question regarding an unalerted jump cuebid

West
AQJ9x
KQx
A10xx
x
North
Kxx
x
Qxxx
AJxxx
East
108xxx
AJxxx
KJx
South
xxxx
xx
KQxxxxx
W
N
E
S
1
2
4
5
6
X
P
P
P
D
6X West
NS: 0 EW: 0

Screened tournament (IMP KO), N and E, S and W are screenmates.

E bid 4C which is agreed to be showing a void with slam interest in . However E did not alert to N about this agreement.

When the tray goes to S/W, W alerted 4 stating the agreement. and the bidding proceeds through as in the diagram.

After the bidding, N lead the A, and surprised that E had a club void.

After 6SX makes, N called director explaining the situation, claiming that he would not have doubled if he knew that 4 shows a void.

What's your ruling?

Table result stand 6SX=, 1210 to EW
X is removed. 6S=, 980 to EW
NS play 7CX-3, 500 to EW
Other, please specify.

Sorry, to answer polls. Registered users can vote in polls, and can also browse other users' public votes! and participate in the discussion.

Getting results...
loading...
367 Comments
Getting Comments... loading...
.

Bottom Home Top