Join Bridge Winners
This is a bit labirintic for me

West
43
AKQ104
AK
KQJ4
East
AJ1082
86
Q8
A652

This deal was dealt a few weeks ago in the Dutch teams championship final.

(here is the link: 

https://www.bridgebase.com/tools/handviewer.html?bbo=y&linurl=https://www.bridgebase.com/tools/vugraph_linfetch.php?id=68152, hand #35)

In one room they ended in 6 while in the other they ended in 7NT.

Players I respect insist that if possible one should not open strong two suiters in 2.

A turnaround is to treat West hand as balanced; in that case the bidding could be: 

2 (multicolor) - 2 - 2NT (22-23 HCP BAL) - 3 (spades) - 3,

and now the first doubt: does the 4 bid by East implies 4+ clubs or is an anticipated cue-bid for spades? 

Here my understanding is that any minor should be natural and 4 would be a re-transfer to .

Lets suppose 4 is natural: any bid now (except for 4NT) by West is a cue-bid for clubs or for spades? (I guess 4 from opener would be  sign off in  and any other bid would be a control for ).

Now from another angle, lets suppose East follows another path and after making the transfer wants to produce a quantitative invitation: should that be in the form of

2NT - 3 

3 - 4 or 5NT?

Finally: do you have any different ideas about the way the bidding should have gone?

 

Thanks in advance

16 Comments
Getting Comments... loading...
.

Bottom Home Top