Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Allan Graves
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
tipping point is coming . also memphis nationals
April 29
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Bryan and Brad et al are spot on
April 28
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The Blue Ribbon was a stand alone premier event. Day 1 was not impacted by another premier event That is what made it premier . When you now create an overlapping event that you consider premium you simply consider them parallel premier events and allow drop ins . This should not be an issue . Moreover it is simply bad policy for a tournament that wants to consider itself a top tournament to force teams that were successful enough to get to the quarter finals to now sit around for two days it is just bad PR
April 27
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
yes Joey was older than both Mike and I. Everything Mike said was true.
April 2
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Great show by the whole team. Not as much of an upset as you might think
April 2
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
sport (n.)
early 15c., “pleasant pastime,” shortening of disport “activity that offers amusement or relaxation; entertainment, fun” (c. 1300), also “a pastime or game; flirtation; pleasure taken in such activity” (late 14c.), from Anglo-French disport, Old French desport, deport “pleasure, enjoyment, delight; solace, consolation; favor, privilege,” related to desporter, deporter “to divert, amuse, please, play” (see sport (v.)), also compare disport (n.).
Game
1) : a physical or mental competition conducted according to rules with the participants in direct opposition to each other

The etymology of game is obscure . Can anyone research this better ?
Miriam Webster seems to define them similarly although in our common usage their is a difference
One difference for our purposes is the element of chance is less in the sport than in the game .

Mind sport seems ok for duplicate bridge
Card game for rubber bridge
Same skill sets , same game although clearly
The two activities are different as their objectives after determining a raw deal score are different .
Discussing these differences would be instructive .
March 28
Allan Graves edited this comment March 28
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Canadian Bridge is not for the fainthearted nor the cold blooded and slams on a finesse only refer to the last finesse.
March 26
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I disagree with. my great friend Boye, This is not in any way shape or form an attempt at equivalency of harm but what if a preschool principle readmitted a convicted paedophile and assured you they were rehabilitated? Would you enrol your child? The abuse of trust and lasting harm of the perpetrator is such that the community cannot take the chance of a re-offence. Collusive cheating should be a lifetime “ one and done ” sentence.
Rember collusive cheaters are con(fidence) men who are adept at developing a relationship with you, gaining your confidence and then breaking that trust to their advantage and your harm. The con- mans verbal assurances, although charismatic, are usually worthless See Madoff, Bernie . They can still play bridge, just not organized tournament bridge. The rest of their life is up to them and clearly not being able to play tournament bridge is not a life-altering hardship. Con-men can always find another con or heaven forbid, do something legitimate outside the bridge world. We cannot afford to indulge their likely re-offense . They lost the privilege of being able to play tournament bridge when they were caught.
March 26
Allan Graves edited this comment March 26
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Projects like this are critical to the survival of bridge in North America. The passenger pigeon was once a billion strong but after being hunted to 6 million it became extinct in a few years. The average age of a tournament player is 73 , The game is not being passed on effectively in the non tournament world and will be such a quaint novelty in a generation that it will no longer be relevant to the overwhelming majority of North Americans. There will no longer be the critical mass to sustain it. If you have enjoyed the bridge community over your lifetime please help in any way you can. Either teach some friends to play rubber bridge ( not duplicate, they can play that later if they want ) or contribute to projects such as Samantha's
Every little bit of effort, in any way you choose, no matter how insignificant it may appear, will help
March 15
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Double transfers have been around since the 1970 's. You have to bid 2C then 2 Major with invitaional hands . You can play it with hearts as well as spades and sort out the tradeoffs any way you want.
March 11
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
It has happened constantly everywhere. Seriously .
And Yes the Hazel Wolpert case was egregous.
March 7
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Randy I did mention it , but good to repeat it.
March 7
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Good points Randy . Most unfortunately ,of those 2441 clubs are currently “ full service ” (ie in a stable facility , open most of the time and with a strong development and player service program ) they are rapidly becoming an extremely poor investment because if I was to run a nice full service club with a. strong new players development program in a nice facility I have overhead and salaries and some form on increasing owner equity needed to justify my investment. Consequently I need to charge table fees and/or membership dues
that make this a viable business. Now one could say that that is the business risk of a capitalist model but if you consider being part of the ACBL Masterpoints plan to be part of your business model then consider this.. The ACBL will award the identical Masterpoints sanction to a church game with no overhead who will then take your players because of lower table fees. Moreover these single session or few session clubs typically add nothing to the development base of the ACBL. In other words the ACBL competes against you and promotes unfair competition while simultaneously syphoning development revenue away from development centers into non developmental clubs. Now please, this is a broad statement with exceptions undoubtedly, so trolls please hold your trolling , but as a description of the ACBL and its relationship with clubs it is accurate.
They also do that by the proliferation of Sectionals and Regionals which add nothing to development but are as much driven by Masterpoint accumulation as they are by any “ love of the game gathering of the clan top competition ” . Every dollar spent at a regional or sectional is a dollar that does not go to a full service club and consequently is not a dollar spent on good ongoing daily service , and hence customer loyalty, and first class development. Any savvy business or marketing expert would see this immediately take whatever steps are necessary to make owning a full service club a good investment. That would be undoubtedly be job one. Jay pointed this out directly in his criticism of the ACBL governance model.On this matter his is an experienced voice that to be listened to.
March 7
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Everything needs to be on the table, so your suggestion warrants consideration. My opinion is that it would need to be taken over “ whole ” rather than dismantled. The ACBL has some valuable physical and intellectual assets that would be hard to replace on short notice should not be squandered.
March 7
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Hi Terry , Thanks for responding. Not sure what your comment is referring to . Could you elaborate please ?
March 7
Allan Graves edited this comment March 7
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I understand why the Nationals opinion expressed by Jay has drawn discussion but the core of his presentation is the deterioration of the clubs and the failed governance model. . If bridge is going to survive it will be through healthy profitable clubs providing a good experience for all bridge players and all those non bridge players who have always wanted to learn. However no business person in their right mind would buy or start a bridge club under the current ACBL “ business ” model. It would be a ridiculous investment. Full service club owners are aging in the same way as the players and there is no one to replace them, same as the players. Secondly he was strongly critical of the ACBL governance structure . Let us discuss these issues as well.
March 7
Allan Graves edited this comment March 7
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Club games are, or should be the backbone of organized bridge. they should be segregated as to peer group as much as possible. If a peer group game is not offered then destructive conventions such as suction , should be severely restricted. The argument that pairs need to practice destructive conventions or play against them for practice is nonsense. They are unfair unless it is within the top group. Unfair trumps everything else at the club level.
Feb. 12
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Better is a Polish originated approach. It is based on a hierarchy ; Default discard is negative and count. Next, If applicable , negative and Lavinthal, Next If applicable, Positive in suit discarded. Else nothing at all, just throwing a card. It is a surprisingly effective. Needs to be in tempo but that is the case with all discarding system that have not been banned in ACBL such as odd even discarding past first discard.
Feb. 12
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Richie “ the Horse ” was famous for his horse racing acumen. He was one of the first to keep an extensive book of statistics on the horses and race tracks that went much deeper than the racing form. His serious bridge partnerships were equally well prepared with extensive system notes in print and audio that reflected the input of many of his partners. He was an excellent professional gambler and his bridge game reflected a very sophisticated grasp of risk/reward I learned a lot from him about that.He focused very well and got the most out of his game. . Like a character from a novel he lived most of his life in hotels. Bye Richie . Don't worry about the swimming poor temperature at the Pearly Gates , they don't have one ,but the windows open and the air is good.
Feb. 10
Allan Graves edited this comment Feb. 10
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Professor Puch's project is a terrific initiative which we all should wholeheartedly support. The benefits of playing bridge can be properly expressed and thoroughly researched by proper scientific methodology. The money she raises goes to this research . Grad student PHD projects on the benefits would be very helpful to marketing initiatives to every demographic that one would think bridge would appeal to. Let us show the world what a great and completely human game bridge is and teach them how to play it.
it is good and good for you.
Feb. 7
Allan Graves edited this comment Feb. 7
.

Bottom Home Top