Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Andrew Lazarus
1 2 3 4 5
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I guess he exaggerated the paperwork issue for comic effect.
Feb. 22
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Ironically, my mother left me her copy of this book, which I loved as a child (I was in school with Buchwald's children) and I just had to discard it when my roof leaked and some books were damaged.
Feb. 21
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Wrote a book “Too Soon to Say Goodbye”. There was some financial issue as he outlived the six months allotted for Medicare hospice care.
Feb. 21
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The fact all but one of your opponents used the written defense strikes me as evidence it's very hard to decide on a good defense in the 5 minutes before the round starts.
Feb. 7
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Is there any line if South is 2=5=4=2 and North is 5=4=3=1?
Jan. 31
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I just wanted to echo trying to find a spouse, child, or caretaker. Harry may have a _treatable_medical condition that isn't so obvious when he isn't trying to concentrate. (Kidney failure, uncontrolled diabetes, and heart problems come to mind, and I'm not an M.D.) Of course, he likely has permanent cognitive decline, but I wouldn't rule out the other possibility.
Jan. 31
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I'm not sure about “unfortunately”. My father (over 90) says no he would rather be dead than confused, although in the event he may change his mind.
Jan. 31
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I'm not going to defend $375K on a failed software implementation, but there is no way that Excel is the correct tool for the job.
Oct. 11, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
On one occasion, yes. I predict a pattern.
Oct. 8, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I like the penalty double. There's never stasis in bidding systems. Without the double, the lower level of the 15-17 becomes good 14, then ordinary 14, etc. More and more hands that could go for a number, if the opponents double.

In a related way, when I play with my Dad, who learned to bid when Blackwood was the newest thing, we don't play Negative Doubles. I'm sure we have missed many excellent part scores, but we have had some serious fun against the modern style of overcalling on crap.
Oct. 4, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Beginners are taught how to handle pre-empts. They are seldom taught how to detect psyches, partly because in these threads, I get the impression if the psyching pair is much more honest against peers. I'm not saying to ignore the opposition—I'll bid more optimistically against pairs I think more likely to misdefend—but improving defense is part of become a better player and detecting psyches better is, generally, not.
Sept. 23, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
If N-S make this same psychic bid against good opponents (including, of course, N raising when he has 16 points and is 4-1-3-5), I'm willing to consider it foolish but not unsportsmanlike. But what makes me think there is an unstated partnership agreement that goes “Against the fish, be alert for my psyches”?
Sept. 23, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
In my college game, North would have held xxxx of hearts, KQx of spades, and a stiff club. The bidding goes 1-2 and then 3NT uttered (before bidding boxes) with an air of finality. Now it would be slapped down on the table with a clear indication North is not expected to correct this “matchpoint bid” to 4. The bid doesn't only count on the cluelessness of the opponents, but partner recognizing that you are the best player at the table and must know what you are doing.
July 13, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Ogust is an alterable bid. If the opponents ask, I think “Ogust” is an even worse short description than usual, because most take that as showing an invitational (or better) hand. I think it's incumbent on your partner to say that while you are asking about opener's values and suit, unlike most people who play “Ogust” you are not promising values of your own.
July 13, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Repeat offenders. I'd even heard one director call to their table earlier, but not that it was ZT as opposed to revoke or lead out of turn.
July 11, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I don't think a disclosed psyche agreement is a psyche in the ACBL sense. It is another possible alternative meaning of a call. My experience is that most psyches are UNDISCLOSED partnership agreements.
July 9, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I played in the New Yorker for the first time last December. I liked it. Although lighting at a couple tables wasn't good. And I got a room below $200.
April 12, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Even against a particular partnership, my double of Player A's 3-level preempt is takeout-oriented while my double of Player B's is “As usual, B doesn't have his bid; is 500 enough or do we need to declare?”
March 15, 2018
1 2 3 4 5
.

Bottom Home Top