Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Andy Anderson
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
when asked… the answer should be “standard - weak, 6-card is common”.. This is full disclosure.
April 24, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I treat the 5-heart “signoff” as Queen Ask if I responded 3 or 4.
I believe that is Kantar's rule..the guru of RCKB
April 24, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Should double be alerted as requesting shorter major? (or any other firm agreement)
Methinks yes,,,but doubt I have ever heard the alert
April 24, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
they want to win ,,,and not are not that interested in improving their game
April 22, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I teach on-line and have presently about 18 clients.. for the most part clients wish to learn… however over the years I have lost a lot of clients, who were mostly concerned with results over learning… I gave it a 20% + rating to learning trumps results. Those that wish to learn seldom drop lessons.
April 22, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
clarity of question is required here,,,,ACBL rules are simple…if 3+ it is not alertable
April 22, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Last I looked there were over 100 systems that might be employed over a 1 nt opener..
IMO It would be a simpler to solve the chicken or egg riddle than to determine through evaluation the best method as these 100+ system authors purported have accomplished
Feb. 4, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
paraphrasing Sir Winston Churchill… “never have so many bridge players owed so much to ….. ” Congratulations for your efforts Boye
Feb. 4, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
playing forcing nt also makes things easier than semi-forcing
Dec. 12, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I expect there have been comments blocked such as slanderous, extremely spiteful or vulgar in nature. One might be of the opinion on reading some of them that you would preferred they had been blocked despite having voted against the notion. Not reading them is hardly an option as enquiring minds do not all subscribe to National Enquirer.
Nov. 1, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Boye B' point is correct.. We do not want “breaking the code” to be the major goal in determining proof of guilt as the cheaters will likely prevail with encryption and the changing of codes. (spy vs spy) Cheaters will need be identified “mathematically” by analyzing data of non-logical actions.
Sept. 18, 2015
.

Bottom Home Top