Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Avon Wilsmore
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 123 124 125 126
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Andrzej,I cannot agree with what you have done here.

Clearly, you have some thoughts about what bid (non-pass) South should choose.

I think it is proper that you:
- say what that bid is
- put forward your reasoning as to why bid should be found
- optionally (but preferably) provide partner's hand
2 hours ago
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Playing in diamonds, you take heart ruffs in the long hand; playing in spades you take ruffs in the short hand.

This is a serious matter.

The only reason for bidding 2 and passing 2NT is that you like (as we surely all do) to watch partner suffer and squirm.
Aug. 24
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Funny you should mention that…

As I said, the methods at the club were very basic, including high encourage/low discourage and high-low = even.

No variations, no extra partnership arrangements.

One day I declared a hand against two Poles. At the end of the hand:

P1: Why did you play a spade? My nine of hearts asked for a club

P2: (Something in Polish)

P1: Oops!
Aug. 24
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
With 2 1/2 Quick Tricks (yes, I am a very old man) I think opening is clear.

What do the 2 bidders intend to do when partner gives presference back to diamonds?

http://www.australianbridge.com/article_39-5_raisingonthree.php
Aug. 24
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Hamish: After continuing spades, West does not win the first diamond… South abandons diamonds and gives the game away, or East will get the chance to discourage clubs.
Aug. 22
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Delete… error.
Aug. 21
Avon Wilsmore edited this comment Aug. 21
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I am going to play declarer for two spades, three diamonds and the club KJ… and play a spade. This is consistent with partner's S2.

Yes, declarer could have played diamonds earlier, but that risks the fourth spade crushing their hand.
Aug. 21
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Ian Grant:

So one E/W pair had a net gain of 23 imps relative to another pair (on this single hand) simply through an accident of seating…
There is a solution to the IMPed pairs problems, play matchpoints!



Ok, so I play matchpoints.

I play against a relay pair; they know one hand down to jacks and bid a double-dummy grand. I get a bottom.

That same pair moves to the next table and relays again; knowing declarer's precise hand allows the defenders to defend amazingly-well; the relay pair gets a bottom.

There is no “solution” to any of this; bridge is a volatile game with a chunk of luck and that's that.
Aug. 17
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Interesting news… many thanks.

I'll PM you.
Aug. 16
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Thanks… but that is the Final.

I am looking for a deal from the qualifying rounds… probably Round 8.
Aug. 15
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Tsingtao is good stuff…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsingtao_Brewery
Aug. 15
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Don't think so… I believe you are thinking of “Turner Hodges”..
Aug. 9
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
If I had illicit knowledge, I wouldn't use it on a hand involving overtricks. I'd wait for a hand with some IMPs at stake.

Yes, it is important to be discreet. Danny Kleinman writes:

The adroit use of illicit signals requires both judgment and discipline. The successful cheater must judge when his illicit information can resolve genuine problems, and take advantage of it only then. He cannot hope to utilize illicit information when he has a clear-cut bid or play available to him; that would exceed tolerance, and enable any suspicious observer to prove a case against him.


Anyway, the Sobel deal is 1957/40:
www.bridgetoernooi.com/index.php/home/pbn2deal/526

The UtT text reads:

As we saw in Four-Four Fits, the Blue Team had a wonderful knack of slotting into a low-level fit without the use of takeout doubles.

Both Norths played 3. In the other room, Sobel… won the heart lead and shifted to a club, succeeding in defeating 3 when the A and K are exchanged. D’Alelio, meanwhile, won the heart lead and played more hearts, building a trump winner and saving an overtrick.
Aug. 6
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
… and there are Wikipedia entries that (IMO) are designed to be cover-ups.

Wikipedia:
The string of Blue Team victories was also followed by some cheating allegations — mainly against “lesser” team members and none against Belladonna–Avarelli, Garozzo–Forquet, or Garozzo–Belladonna.

Except that every member of the 1958 US team signed a declaration that all of the BT players were cheating, and the 1963 Gerber Letter said the entire BT was cheating, and the 1976 Burgay Tape alleges that Forquet and Belladonna (and others) used illict signals, and Garozzo and Belladonna used cigarette lighter clicks once the screens went up…


Wikipedia:
Before the 1978 Olympiad in New Orleans, a new slate of officials was elected by the FIB who were able to satisfy the WBF that the required investigation had been performed. It is reported that the tape was lost and “no transcript exists.” The threat of suspension was lifted.

Except that the results of this “required investigation” were never released, and there was never an investigation into the fabricated exonerating tape produced by FIB…
Aug. 6
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Having done French at high school many years ago (thank you, Mrs Taylor)… kanaPAY.

Any error is sure to be mine, and not Mrs Taylor's.
Aug. 6
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
As they say in America, “I am like wow”.

If you have what you think is an undetectable secret line of communication…

To what pair are you referring?

It can't be Fisher-Schwartz, Balicki-Zmudzinski, Elinescu-Wladow, Lanzarotti-Buratti, Fantoni-Nunes, Piekarek-Smirnov…


To be more precise, you say:

That's what really bewilders me about the whole business, from Reese-Schapiro onwards. If you have what you think is an undetectable secret line of communication - why use it to communicate only one thing?


I quote Denis Howard, one-time President of the Australian Bridge Federation and World Bridge Federation, ACBL CEO and Chairman of one of Australia’s largest law firms, on the topic of Facchini-Zucchelli (who doubtless thought they had a “undetectable secret line of communication”)

Two other defense arguments can be briefly adverted to. One is that a few hysterical Americans psyched themselves and proceeded to make a giant mountain from a tiny molehill. The other is that nobody would adopt such a clumsy method of cheating.

As to the former, there is again, like a spectre at the feast, the question of the eye witness evidence. O’Sullivan, the most damaging of the observers, was not asked one question by the defense at the WBF hearing. He was neither American nor hysterical and his evidence was unchallenged.

As to the latter, they said the same thing about Reese and Schapiro at Buenos Aires. It isn’t really an argument, as any analysis of the criminal mentality will quickly show; it is merely the expression of an illusion about human behaviour
Aug. 5
Avon Wilsmore edited this comment Aug. 5
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Mike Lawrence:
Belladonna gave this a lot of thought. Later when I saw his hand I wasn’t sure what he had been thinking. Then he started that staring routine so popular with Jaïs and Trézel. All of the same mannerisms. Look left. Look right. Look at partner.

Alan Truscott:
As (Ira Rubin) began play (in the 1976 Bermuda Bowl Final)… he noticed… Belladonna had a cigarette in his mouth… on the table in front of him was a cigarette lighter which he would click occasionally during the bidding. Rubin did not have a lighter, but he had a pen, and joined in with occasional clicks of his own.

Bobby Wolff:
I asked Benito (in a stairwell between floors) to please stop bringing lighters to the table with them. He looked quizzical and I then offered, Bob and I also will promise to not making any noise whereupon he made what is to me a worthwhile quote, “I’m not worried about either one of you and never have been.” In any event, he agreed and the noises stopped…

Jaime Ortiz-Patiño
I understood the tape well and was in little doubt of its authenticity, the background noises and such like being thoroughly convincing. The tape was recorded on a Sunday and indeed one could hear church bells sounding on the tape. In places, my jaw literally dropped. The media would have loved it: smoke signals, pauses, commonplace words with coded meanings — all these came into the picture.

Bobby Wolff:
…while Jimmy (Ortiz-Patiño) was in Dallas he informed me that every member of the Blue Team was implicated . Burgay also informed me in Shanghai, 2007 that while the tapes were all 100% true in everything involving bridge and what went on…

Eric Kokish:
…but not until now has the full extent of the Blue Team’s collusive cheating been catalogued and revealed. Wilsmore’s book is the product of vast amounts of scholarly research, cross-referencing, and verification. As you read through the deals you will be horrified by the extent of what happened without official challenge or responsible investigation, and you will be in no doubt that the author’s conclusions are accurate.
Aug. 5
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Hands where a club return is successful far outnumber hands where a diamond return is better.

Regardless, I agree that much more evidence is needed before one has anything like a presentable case.

Well, you never know what's around the corner…
Aug. 4
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
See Paul East's comment, above.
Aug. 3
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Ask Hobson.
Aug. 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 123 124 125 126
.

Bottom Home Top