Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Avon Wilsmore
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
All possible votes? Hmm… this brings to mind an interesting and similar hand - Board 83, 1966 Bermuda Bowl.

Vul against not: A10xxx Axx x KQxx

After 1S / / ?

Belladonna DOUBLED.

And before I get fed the usual rubbish about their off-shape doubles, from the “Roman Club System of Distributional Bidding”:

“The requirements for the double are 12 - 16 points with 4-4-3-2, 4-4-4-1, 5-4-3-1 or 5-4-2-2 distributions, where the long suits are not the same as the suit opened.

4-3-3-3 and 5-3-3-2 (with the doubleton in the suit opened) are also permissible.”
Nov. 16, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Why is 3 not the splinter?
A much better call if it is…
Nov. 15, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Tim Seres is “on record” as saying that to open 3 at rubber bridge against strong opponents with:
xx KQJxxxx xx xx
is a waste of time.
- no defensive tricks
- every suit will break for them
- if they need to place a card they will do so successfully

He said that one might choose open 3 at pairs or teams to stay on the same tracks as other table(s) but at total points it was a clear loser. Tim was pre-empting with “stuff” on the side in the 50s.
Nov. 10, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
For more on the psychology of win/loss thinking, see “Wait” by Frank Partnoy, Prof of Law and Finance, U. San Diego.

http://frankpartnoy.com/wait/
Nov. 8, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Quite so. The player who backs into the auction with chaff pays a fearsome price against strong opponents.
Nov. 8, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Ten is a good card. The “play the card you are known to hold” principle has many applications.
Nov. 3, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I'd rather concede one down than agree with Dean. :)
Nov. 3, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I think it's unlikely that partner has a penalty double of 1. And perhaps they could have run to 1 if he has.

Given no heart raise, I don't mind the 1NT at all (so long as one plays “better than 1NT opening” for such a call), putting the overcaller on lead..

I'd be happy to be in game opposite many flat 5-6 counts.
Nov. 2, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
To the right of the contract above I wrote, “a diamond lead”. You then write that because I “do not announce what happened at trick one, we make the assumption that a diamond was led at trick one.”

A very fine assumption indeed.

I posted the hand (from 1948) as a neat exercise in control and trick-counting for those who might not have seen such an example. That is why I wrote, “It will be a puzzle for anyone not familiar with the theme.” Perhaps you didn't read that either.

I have noticed over some months that you miss few, if any, opportunities to tell the world how trivial you find the material posted at BW. Strangely, I have found the reading skills of the lesser players to be superior.
Nov. 2, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I agree with Mr Woolsey that the board should have been thrown out. Relying upon the virtue of players is absurd.

But why should the talkers not be penalised? Why can they not shut up at the end of a hand? They were not attempting to iron out some matter of partnership arrangement, they were engaging in gratuitous waffle about slam prospects.
Oct. 28, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Time for an Edgar Kaplan special traetment… 4NT natural.
Oct. 26, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Sound stuff. Playing transfers after a X is very foolish for all the reasons above. Science gone mad…
Oct. 23, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Anyone who plays relay soon finds out that they are good for bidding slams and bad for bidding games.
Oct. 23, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The original Bernasconi contest allowed world-class players 45 mins a hand and you want to allow an hour for 12 of those hands?

In Australia we say, “Write your own ticket.”
Oct. 20, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
But what class of par contest are we considering?

The at-the-table type of the 50s and 60s? Or the Bernasconi type, where getting one hand right is a major achievement?
Oct. 19, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The Australians who did a great deal of work on par hands were Mick Sullivan and Bob Williams. The later was Seres' partner at the 1960 Olympiad; Seres was not involved in par hand creation.

More info here:

http://acblstory.wordpress.com/2012/07/30/acbl-bridge-beat-86-world-par-contests/

http://www.bridgeguys.com/Winners/world_par_contests_lenz_trophy.html
Oct. 19, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Hate to be unduly pedantic, but 5NTXX must be the rarest contract.
Oct. 18, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
2 is serious misdescription. Opposite:
Kxxxxx xxxx Kx x, slam is excellent.

Kaplan-Rubens count rates the dealer's hand at 14.5

http://www.jeff-goldsmith.org/cgi-bin/knr.cgi?hand=a10xx+–+AJ10987+Jxx

Further:
http://learngoodbridge.blogspot.com/2011/03/hand-evaluation-let-me-introduce-you-to.html
Oct. 15, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Obviously it denies a void.
Oct. 6, 2013
.

Bottom Home Top