Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Bill March
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Jack,though this has been done to death on bridgewinners someone who's been a member as long as you must be aware of 2 things..
1)Nearly everyone knows the best methods.
2)Sadly they're all different.
April 30
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
David - I’d really appreciate why you think that . To me the knowledge that you have re the difference in the 2 scenarios as to the opponents combined strength and fit is sufficiently low that 2NT (whatever you think it is) should have the same meaning in each situation.
April 29
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Interesting to compare the results so far (heavy support for 2NT)with the voting in this problem
https://bridgewinners.com/article/view/bidding-problem-2-7taicadvwn/
I notice that 2 of those that bid 2NT in the other problem(4D,5C) bid 2NT in this one - I’d be interested in whether they have simply changed their mind re the best treatment or if they view this as a different situation(and why?)
April 28
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Although I’ve given the actual auction it seemed to me that the optimal meaning of the double may vary with the combination of suits eg a 3D opener overcalled with 3H/S is a different kettle of fish.
Also ,could a case be made that partners double is an either/or situation and RHO’s bid ‘reveals’ what it is?
April 25
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Think you’ve got this the wrong way round!
April 24
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I was converted to split several years ago and nothing I’ve seen since has persuaded me to change back.
April 22
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Is this an UI problem?
April 18
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Surely for the purposes of a ruling statements such as ‘I was always bidding game’ have to be ignored?
April 16
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Wife, correct.
Husband, wrong.
Now, what's the question?
April 15
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
First of all some partners will try stayman with 44 in the majors and less than game interest.
Secondly ,even if partner will always have 9 cards for garbage stayman then if their only option is 2H then you have to guess your 42 fit - for which I have an unerring ability.
April 13
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
On another thread a few years ago I recounted how in my student days I was playing a hand in hearts after a transfer auction. Halfway through I was in dummy and had the rest of the tricks once I’d drawn the outstanding low trump.However I thought it was higher than any of mine so called for a low trump.Once rho had won this my partner in some alarm at what else I might perpetrate claimed the rest stating ‘dummy’s high’!
April 12
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Kostas - and a current world champion couldn’t go off in 7NT with a rational line…
April 6
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
‘being able to narrowly define range and pattern in a single bid is the weightier consideration’ - couldn’t agree more,but what’s that got to do with the modern style of 1NT opener?
April 6
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Paul ,it was - suffice to say the auction was not replicated, but I did want to check how popular a double was.
April 5
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
This seems like a non problem - doubling(as I did) was what partner wanted to hear,he took 5 tricks and I took none!
April 5
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
My own pref here is for the specific sequence 1H 1S 1NT being 12-16, as you say all styles have pluses and minuses.
April 4
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Though I lead a club it could easily be wrong,and when I'm on lead it usually is!
April 2
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
A teammate of mine had this problem a few years back in the Tollemache - slightly stronger and majors reversed. Approx 20 seconds after his double the opps were in 6D(+1).
April 1
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
FWIW partners hand was AKQxxxx xx x Kxx
March 28
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Shawn - the evidence of the casebooks is that ‘Name’ players do get more favourable rulings,over and above the ability to argue their case better.
March 26
.

Bottom Home Top