Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Carl Chadwick
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
That truly is an ignorant and completely unnecessary comment Gary. Nothing in my post warrants that conclusion. “He's rejected every suggestion made by the good people here”? Your comment clearly shows that you have not been reading others' views on this subject. I know how important it is to you to always get in the last word, so knock yourself out, I will not respond to your questionable manners again.
Jan. 26, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Posting that people are no longer looking adds still more clutter. Going in the wrong direction here.
Jan. 26, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
This agrees with my earlier comment, Scott, that were posters able to delete their own partnership requests as they see fit, this site would be more accurate and tidier.

Jan. 25, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The first Denver partnership request would be the 5th entry on the list of 44 partnership postings Neal. I still seem to scratch my head about the need for the final 40.
Jan. 25, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I don't see the relevance of your comment Gary to my suggestion.
Jan. 25, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I guess Eugene it doesn't seem such an onerous task to me - perhaps I am unaware of what would be involved? I would have guessed less than a minute or two. Can you not allow the poster to delete his own posting without the need for BW to be involved?
Jan. 25, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Mike now has to spend those 2 weeks celebrating the Christmas holidays at home with his family, doing last minute shopping, attending New Year's Eve parties, not to mention having to watch those annoying NFL playoffs and bowl games. That'll teach him.
Nov. 27, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
My inner ear itches at times which I relieve by scratching. From now on I'm going to check to see if I hold the spade jack when this irritation occurs. If this is indeed the problem, it will save me a visit to the doctor.
Oct. 19, 2015
Carl Chadwick edited this comment Oct. 20, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
A prolonged stare would be ill-advised but a quick furtive glance at minimum should be expected if you are awaiting a signal. I am looking at Z's eyes when the signal is offered to see where he is looking - often C withdraws his “signal” (perhaps in frustration) when it is clear to him his partner is not paying attention.
Oct. 16, 2015
Carl Chadwick edited this comment Oct. 16, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Sorry, Sigurbjorn; I don't seem to see that. I haven't looked at every video, but I have looked at enough to notice
what seems to me a general disinterest in Z looking at his partner. More often he is looking at his opponent or elsewhere. Graininess is not an issue for me in these videos. Interesting that your perception differs. I am not suggesting that BZ are not cheating - B's hand positions are pretty suspicious and more importantly, seem very deliberate. But I would expect Z's focus on his partner's antics to be more obvious than I see in these videos. Am I alone in these observations?
Oct. 16, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Sadly. I lack that skill. I have to look to see.
Oct. 16, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Although it appears pretty obvious (maybe too obvious?) that Balicki is clearly making an unusual gesture with his hand flat and fingers extended, it seems that Z is not looking nor paying attention to his action on the majority of these hands. Would you not expect him to be more vigilant and attentive to his partner's “signal” whether it is forthcoming or not on all hands? Don't just look at B, but Z as well.
Oct. 16, 2015
Carl Chadwick edited this comment Oct. 16, 2015
.

Bottom Home Top