Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Eduard Velecky
1 2
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
For Ed Reppert: of course, only unusual 3NT would require an alert. 3NT to play is not alertable.

It is the same as in the US or in UK. We use standard alert policy.
March 20
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
3nt is alertable. Our local regulation is that bids over 3NT without screens are not alertable.
March 20
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
North is not beginner, North is very experienced player.
March 20
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
We use standard EBL alerting policy (http://www.eurobridge.org/alerting-policy.aspx).

In principle every calls which carries a specific message about the suits or the strength of the hand, must be alerted.
March 19
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Propably yes, but I am not sure.
March 19
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Actual agreement was 3NT is natural.
March 19
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Repetitio (est) mater studiorum?

http://bridgewinners.com/article/view/the-king-is-dead/
March 12
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Congrats guys. Again nice succes for bulgarian bridge.
Feb. 19
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
David write: “At the start of Chennai the wbf was presented with substantial evidence”.

From https://pl.scribd.com/doc/283676080/Rumour-and-Mathematics-pdf

The Chairman’s answers that the Commitee is allowed to take a decision of not inviting players WITHOUT GIVING A REASON. Mr. Aubry admits, however, “that a material on Balicki-Żmudzińki’s misbehaviour has reached WBF. The MATERIAL HAS NOT YET BEEN ANALYSED”.

Substantial evidence = without giving a reason and not analysed. Nice.
Feb. 14
Eduard Velecky edited this comment Feb. 14
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
http://www.defendingoregon.com/innocent-v-guilty/

Juries never find defendants innocent. They cannot. Not only is it not their job, it is not within their power. They can only find them “not guilty.”
Feb. 12
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Michael, it was not about Hitler (Godwin law), it was the irony.
Sept. 26, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Gary,

do you know how popular was Hitler in 1939?
Sept. 26, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Richard, are errors that cannot fix. For example, not possible to play the match (or deal, etc.) again.

But are mistakes which can be corrected. They requires only administrative work. Work after 24 hours or after 1 year, what is the difference? Nothing.

Justice difference, however, is significant.
Sept. 21, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
From the practical point of view is not difference between 24 hours or two months or one year. It's just an emotional difference.

But different: why is fairly correct the errors after 24 hours, but not after 25 hours?
Sept. 21, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
24 hours is not enough time.

An example: we found a really complicated error in the input data entered by the referee only because the result was counted by other program. It was completely by chance and it happened two months after the competition.

The result remained in force, but it was not the right solution. The correct solution is to seek justice without time limit (see WADA time limits).
Sept. 21, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Different cultur is unhappy expression.

We don't need a war between “differents culturs”.

We need a solution, not a hassle.
Sept. 19, 2016
Eduard Velecky edited this comment Sept. 19, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Please excuse my bad English. I want to assure everyone who will criticize my following contribution, that I understand the problems discussed very well.

But I also think there is an incredible mess in our game.

As if the affairs with cheaters would not be enough, or the incomprehensible procedures of referees in the match USA vs. Spain. So now the referees are unable to detect an elementary error in the input data in competition, where the entry fee is about € 100,000.

And when this error is found, then the bridge world meditates about that whether the real-winner should be the persons who really won instead of the persons who won thanks to this error.

If an elementary justice systematicaly will not be available in our game, then we can straight bury it.
Sept. 19, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
“I think this result will stand forever.”

Right legally, but morally indefensible.
Sept. 18, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
You dont double 3nt with two keycards (A,K) after partner openning? In my opinion pass with A and Q is possible, but I double 3nt with these cards.
April 5, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Uninstall.exe doesnt work, installation folder cant be deleted.

These program characteristics are like a computer virus.

I apologize that I do not write “politically correctly”,
but this offer should be best quickly removed from this page.
Feb. 18, 2016
Eduard Velecky edited this comment Feb. 18, 2016
1 2
.

Bottom Home Top