You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Deal is from our solvers club. The 3 bid is not alerted.
May 24, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
From WBF and EBL Alert policy

The following classes of calls should be alerted:

…. Non-forc ing jump changes of suit responses to opening bids or overcalls, and nonforcing new suit responses by an unpassed hand to opening bids of ONE of a suit…
May 24, 2018
Eduard Velecky edited this comment May 24, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
@Thomas

Agree, 3H is propably trial bid.

But analysis says: hearth support is no problem. The key problem is spade support.

With 4 cards spades you play a good game, but with 3 cards spades game is bad.

This mean: trial hearth bid is not properly used with these cards.

PS. This is just a hypothesis, I do not know the exact system response to the trial bid and other invites in their system.
March 17, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Statistical results with Deal 3.1 program. 500 deals generated.

If opener have 11-13 points, balanced hand with 4-5 diamonds, with exactly 3 spades and without 4hearts, then (double dummy) chance for spade game is 21% (4hearts 15.3%).

If opener have 11-13 points, balanced hand with 4-5 diamonds, with 3 or 4 spades and without 4hearts, then (double dummy) chance for spade game is 29.6% (4hearts 18%).

If opener have 11-13 points, balanced hand with 4-5 diamonds, with exactly 4 spades and without 4hearts, then (double dummy) chance for spade game is 52.4% (4hearts 18%).
March 17, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Maybe, but I did not want to test the logical alternative.

1. Is agreed hesitation after 5 hearts unauthorised information?
2. If yes, what this UI suggests?

Thx :)…
Oct. 14, 2017
Eduard Velecky edited this comment Oct. 14, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Thank you, it's really interesting.
Oct. 9, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Richard, you are a commentator for the EBU Appeals Booklets.

I assume you know the definition of a serious error and rule 12c1(e), which say about extremely serious errors.

In your opinion, is the club (10) lead in this deal a (extremely) serious error?
Oct. 9, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Will there be obligation (as the fight contra “sexist” and “discrimination”) kibitz (for example on BBO) all championships equally?
Aug. 25, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I agree. I add that my question (“Someone may help me with finding a relevant reason etc..”) was a rethorical question. I have been a programmer a lifetime. I am convinced that these shortcomings on EBL/WBF web sites are the result of a monopolistic approach typical for central institutions. They are the consequence of insufficient pressure from the bridge public and national associations (sry, my english is poor, but I hope that these words makes sense).
June 30, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Human psychology is unchangeable. People want to know the value of their individual contribution. It motivates them to better individual performances. Yes, in some cases, this can be the opposite.

However, it is not the task of the organizers to make such a situation completely suppressed. Leave it on the players, on their social and game inteligence. Players know best what is good for them.
June 30, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
http://tinyurl.com/y7puh664 is results of the yesterday junior tournament:
- all information in one web page
- an overview of the position during the competition
- GIB (with bbo handviewer help)
- private score sheet, ranking for all rounds, etc

Comment: this is not an ad, our product is not for sale.
June 29, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Tx for specification. I was only once there. That was when two printers worked. Next time I was only in the drinks/foods and toilets queues (bitter experience for full life), I skipped the results. I'm a player, right :)?

PS. In our local tournaments, after the end of the session, the referee divides frequency and hand diagrams. Without a problem, one for 50 pairs. The referees are for the game, not the other way around.
June 29, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Sorry, but I do not need a database. I call for complex results on the website.
June 29, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Pdf diagrams here, the results there, the frequency of the other - is the goulash.
June 29, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Ultimate issue: must partner pass the double from S? With heart trick propably yes, but with xxxx too?
June 26, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
June 26, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
For Ed Reppert: of course, only unusual 3NT would require an alert. 3NT to play is not alertable.

It is the same as in the US or in UK. We use standard alert policy.
March 20, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
3nt is alertable. Our local regulation is that bids over 3NT without screens are not alertable.
March 20, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
North is not beginner, North is very experienced player.
March 20, 2017
.

Bottom Home Top