Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Efrahim Akan
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
exquisite writing… thank you so much for this deep analysis
March 17
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
lack of strength and favorable vulnerability called me for a psychic
April 4, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
can't partner have a heart stack, why not give him/her chance for business
Feb. 7, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
abstained, direct 1nt opening would have been my choice
Jan. 18, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Convincing revelations that there might (must?) have been unauthorized flow of information within partnership
Dec. 8, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Does this mean that your team lost by 1 IMP only?
Such an epic end to a terrific series. Keep up writing!!!
Dec. 8, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
why dont we have such writings more in BW? Delightful
Sept. 21, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
what was the winning lead in this case?
May 31, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Is opening 1n an option?
That would be my choice
Jan. 19, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
next move? we are done … partner has a yarborough
Dec. 29, 2012
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
according to BridgeGoth there are 3 goals for overcalling … 1-showing opening values, 2-taking space from opponents, 3-lead directing … hearts do not serve none of the purposes…therefore with spades go ahead; having hearts hushh..
Dec. 28, 2012
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
before asking such a TRIVIAL question, I recommend you to read articles published by Mr.Gumperz teaching preemptives (“better preempts” + “most damaging preemptives” series)…
Dec. 12, 2012
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
without any of those side honors, 2s it is
Nov. 19, 2012
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
2c is NOT a thing of beauty..
Nov. 19, 2012
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
what a wide range of no trump ..
Sept. 19, 2012
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
still? it is only applicable when our partner cannot act over 3s
June 7, 2012
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
we are allowed to place partner 7 working points … even that is more than we need
June 6, 2012
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
abstained
March 12, 2012
.

Bottom Home Top