Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Gábor Szőts
1 2 3 4 ... 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ... 91 92 93 94
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Both (2) and (4) seem to apply here to me. Still, I would not bid but redouble to show the nature of my hand and willingness to penalize them.

BTW, North seems to have taken insurance by asking about the hesitation. His plan was probably to call the director in case EW now bids and makes game.
Jan. 23, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
You might look at it this way:
If 1-2-2-3 is a natural raise, what do you bid having support and spade shortness? If you bid 3 you are not going to have the opportunity to show your shortness.
You may agree that a jump to 4 shows short spades but then you have bypassed 3NT which might easily be your best contract.
Jan. 23, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
You are not. If 3 shows 3-card support I think it is a good idea for 2 to show only 2, as you described.
Besides, showing only 2 does not exclude that it may be 3.
Jan. 22, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
It is most logical to play this bid as a splinter. 4-card spade raises usually go through a direct 2NT. 3-card spade raises can go via 2, 2NT, the 4th suit or a splinter in a side suit (BTW, I think 4 here is also a splinter in support of spades).
Jan. 22, 2018
Gábor Szőts edited this comment Jan. 22, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Nonforcing. Bid 4 if you want to reach game.
Jan. 22, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The first example hand comes closest although I would not remove 1NT with that one.
Jan. 21, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
With 8 sure tricks and the opponents content with 1 I would not be afraid of bidding 3.
Jan. 18, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
3 is not obligatory with solid diamonds. You can bid 3 as well.
Jan. 18, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I don't debate the merits of the bid. I was asked what it means and came to my answer by way of elimination.
Jan. 17, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Only, having a couple of spades himself, that scenario can be excluded or at least extremely unlikely.
Jan. 17, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
18-19 balanced, no spade stopper, no 4. Responder places contract.

With the solid diamond hand I'd jump to 3. With a big 2-suiter I'd jump in my second suit.
Jan. 17, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
If I only knew an effective rule of thumb!

With an (5332) hand I usually bid on having a side doubleton and pass if I have a doubleton club.
Jan. 16, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I'd have bid 6 at my previous turn.
Jan. 16, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
West has 3622 distribution. Could not double 2 lest it be left in.
Jan. 16, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
3-level splinters can be a minimum, 4-level ones require extras.
Jan. 16, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Even if you don't use illegal information directly, it relieves you of a lot of strain and you'll be able to avoid mistakes by using that spare energy. That effect is invisible and cannot be proven.
Jan. 13, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Too bad you wouldn't play strong NT putting all weak balanced hands in 1.
Jan. 11, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Thanks. Good to hear you have no problems other than memory strain.
Jan. 10, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
You mean 1-1M-1NT, where opener's 1NT is the multi-meaning bid? That's the sequence I am interested in.
Jan. 9, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
It all depends on what 5 over 5 means for them. I feel there was some misunderstanding between them but Mikael might clarify this.
Jan. 9, 2018
1 2 3 4 ... 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ... 91 92 93 94
.

Bottom Home Top