Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Gábor Szőts
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Thanks for the votes.

I held this hand and I chose the majority vote of 4. The successful bid, however, would have been the double. Partner held: xx, K109x, AKQ, AKJx.
You can see the whole hand here (I was pair no7): http://bridzs.hu/result/5154/5326/19imp1b08-6.htm
April 25
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Optional: either you leave it in or I leave you out.
April 20
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
If they did not bid 5 and parner bid 5, would I have passed? If yes, I bid 5 now, if not, I bid 6. The situation hasn't changed.
I'm bidding 6 anyway. If partner has A, fine. If not, they may lead the wrong ace.
April 14
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I chose the first answer but I don't think I'll need 4 spades to penalize them, in fact I think 3 cards would be typical in this situation.
April 8
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I might have bid 5 as North at my 1st turn but I would have certainly not passed 5 with the exceptional South hand. After all, North thought he'd make 5 facing wasted heart values.
March 25
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
We play 1 to show 4+ diamonds, and a raise to 2 is a normal raise, maybe on 3 cards. Our 1NT rebid may be slightly unbalanced with 5 clubs and our 2 rebid shows only 5.
With stronger hands we either reverse in a major or bid 2NT which shows a one-suiter.
All this in a system in which the 2 opening is 18-19 BAL.
March 12
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I don't see 1 as an error over a reopening double. Back to 100%.
March 9
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Partner also heard 3. He won't bid them with less than 5. And we have lots of points so why should we be afraid playing a 8-card heart fit? If the opp doubles (holding 5), I'd redouble.
March 9
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
He will get his wish, only on defence.
March 9
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Hi Ian,

Thanks for the details. I don't say I agree with rebidding 2 on 3 but if you are fine with that so am I.
March 8
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I don't know what you mean by how forcing. If pass is an option then 1NT is non-forcing.
Obviously, playing 2/1 puts its upper boundary at 11 HCP's.
March 5
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
There is so much variety in the texture of such a hand that I could not provide examples. I'd be grateful if you could specify the conditions upon which you would base your choice, although I feel you would consider 1NT with the appropriate doubletons.
March 5
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I hope this opens the eyes of all relevant bodies.
March 5
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I'm relieved. I never consume alcohol in the playing area or the toilet. There is a nice pub just across the street where we play our bridge…
March 1
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I hope beer won't be banned.
Feb. 28
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
-X/XX: cards
-cue-bid (1 in your example): what X would have meant over a natural 1
-others: what they would have meant over a natural 1

That is what we play over all transfers against which we do do not have a specific defence.
Feb. 22
Gábor Szőts edited this comment Feb. 22
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Frances: I do think that what you wrote was sensible. I guess I should have begun with confirming that.
But my partner said he would play the double to show they have the weak version.
Feb. 18
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
'pretend they have opened at the minimum level in the anchor suit as a pre-empt'

I think that is just what players of these conventions want to achieve: we don't disturb their strong openings.
Feb. 18
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Normally, partner is going to lead one of the unbid suits. If you double when you'd like the lead of one of the unbid suits, you definitely decrease your chances because you bring 2 other suits into the picture. I'd go as far as claiming that you make him impossible to find the desired lead.
Feb. 18
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
This was a tournament played on tablets and the convention card was submitted in an electronic way. It could be invoked by the click of a button. Unfortunately, by the time you can see that button you have already seen your hand.
Feb. 18
.

Bottom Home Top