Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Gábor Szőts
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I have not thought about details yet.
Nov. 29, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Here is a simple response structure, using only 5 bids:
- 2: 4+, no 4+
- 2: puppet to 2NT, denies 4+. Continuations as over a 2NT opening, taking into consideration that responder cannot have 4+.
- 2NT: balanced slam try
- 3: 4-4 in the majors or 5+4+
- 3: 5+4

Of course you can do better but this cannot be hard to remember.
Nov. 29, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
“Alternatively play 2♦ as 18-19 NT and put the weak 2♦ into the 2♣ opening”
Yes, that is something I am considering too.
Nov. 29, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Thanks for all those responses and discussion.

For the record, I was East. These were my thoughts:
With a distributional hand I would have bid something over 3, so my pass over 3 must be a (semi)balanced hand. When partner passed over 4 I thought he must be strong or have spade shortness. As I did not have spade wastage, I bid on, and cue-bid my K on the way.

I accept that my reasoning was not flawless. In the heat of the battle I do make such mistakes. But I don't think my mum would not have forgiven me for that. My partner certainly did.
Nov. 29, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
3. Then 4 over 3, 4 over 3NT or 4, 5 over 4.
Nov. 7, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
As I myself post problems it is of interest to me how many days you think I should wait before showing the solution? BW readers seem quite inpatient to me sometimes.
Nov. 7, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Here is the whole hand. You can even watch how the play went at all of the tables in all of the boards. It is worth studying how to use the lovebridge software, I assure you it is great!
https://vugraph.lovebridge.com/screen/visoft_1447835_7_1?screen=replay&ns=1447818&board=10
Nov. 2, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The 9 came from declarer.

In this partnership first priority is attitude.
Nov. 1, 2019
Gábor Szőts edited this comment Nov. 1, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I'm going to publish the whole deal tomorrow.
Nov. 1, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Neither to me.
Sept. 28, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Thanks for the votes. The hand in question: https://vugraph.lovebridge.com/screen/visoft_1447835_2_1?screen=frequency&boardNumber=10
Sept. 27, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
You can change your vote to 1 if you wish.
Sept. 26, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
First I allowed 7 to stand but Michael's reasoning convinced me to change my vote.
BTW, partly because he has described his hand, I never allow a limited notrumper ask for aces (with some obvious exceptions such as after a splinter).
Sept. 25, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I am not drawing trumps at all but lead a diamond immediately.
Aug. 16, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Theoretical question. You'll do it every time it comes up, unless the dealer is told not to deal singleton controls.
Aug. 16, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
3M via 2 is a practice session.
Aug. 15, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I'd bid 3 on 1, 2 and 8, bid 4 on 5 and pass with the rest.
Aug. 7, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Well, I can't correct that mistake now but doubler's actual hand was: KQ8x, 108xx, AK, AJ10.
July 22, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I am sorry at losing your vote. If once we happened to play together I would agree to play these doubles for penalty.
July 21, 2019
.

Bottom Home Top