Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Gabriel Fractman
1 2 3
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Unfortunately the new generations think of something else when talking about “The Avengers” …

You can also say that Diana Rigg was the only woman to marry James Bond in a movie.
Nov. 8
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
In the first scene where Bogart appears in Casablanca he is in his office analyzing a chess position; that was an inner tribute to his interest in chess.
Nov. 8
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I think in many (if not most) tables, West showed also his Diamond suit.
That made South concern about the 4-0 break more reasonable. Particularly if East somehow managed to find a double of the final contract.
Sept. 9
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The deal is highlighted in the great book “Famous Bridge Disasters”.
Apparently some of the heart contracts going down were doubled and even redoubled!
Sept. 8
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
You are all in the right track. But what happens when West covers with the A the first round of ?

Incidentally, what is the a priori probability of West having both honours (knowing that East does not have them both)? And what is the probability of West having them both after he played the A?
July 9
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Four trumps.
Two outside aces.
A useful void.
A good five card suit as source of tricks.
Never support partner's suit.

This seems to be not so unusual in BBO.
June 30
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Thank you to all that answered and commented so far.
I will wait one or two days and post the actual hand so as to see how different decisions would have fared.
May 29
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
This is a nice problem, as the “obvious” solution that comes immediately to your mind is not the right one.

And it is not because the problem is ambigous or incorrectly stated; it is because your mind think it knows both the problem and the answer and does not really think what is written but what it has already decided. Never happened at the bridge table?

To make my point, think at the problem stated in this way: imagine we have to gamblers whose strategy is to try to win two times in a row, so that when they win one time they bet all the winnings the next roll. One of them is trying to get a 6-6 sequence while the other a 1-2 sequence. If the game is fair (i.e. the house pays 6 to 1), which strategy is better?

Obviously this is a zero-sum game, so there is no strategy that can change your expected winnings (or losses). Maybe this is the question you thought you were answering.

Does this contradict all the comments regarding the posted problem? If you think about it for a minute (how the bettings would develop), you will see that it does not. But to be fair, I cheated since I did not state the conditions of this other problem in a clear way.
April 6
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Without really bad breaks 6 should have many chances; if partner cannot complement my then I may be able to ruff one.

Of course, it is a bit a shot in the dark as he could be something like 8-0-4-1, but if that is the case we may even be down in 4.
March 29
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The situation is terribly fuzzy because the range of hands that North and South can have (both in terms of HCP and distribution) is very wide. North and South know very little about what the other has.

But with the hand you show it would be too lazy (and bad bridge) for South to bid only 4. That hand should be something like 4 or 3, but not a simple 4.
March 23
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Sorry you did not appreciate the humour ..
March 15
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Apologies. You are right, I did misread the problem.
March 1
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Sorry, I meant 1 5 3 then 2 (which is in position 1) then 4 (which is in position 5).
March 1
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
You start from the edge but do not go 12345 … try 1 5 3 2 4.
March 1
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
If you start from any of the edges and misguess then the dealer does not have a choice if he does swap it with an adjacent card.
March 1
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
You can ensure to find the lady in 5 tries with equal probability, so your expected average is 3$. Which means the player will most probably end up with a small gain (and the club with a small loss).

This assuming that the deal is actually random, and assuming that ending with a bunch of club pens can be considered a gain for the player. In any case, it would be a loss for the club.

The strategy is not to difficult … start from any of the edges.
March 1
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Or unless West is good enough to play the J from AJ9 or KJ9. Classic false-card in the books, as always not so easy to find at the table.
Feb. 28
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Txs!
Feb. 26
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Sorry I cannot confirm, but could be. My friends played it in BBO, so they may have chosen that VuGraph archive file.
Feb. 24
1 2 3
.

Bottom Home Top