You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
There will be another article published as a result of the recent unconscionable action.
As Chris notes, the SEC has set an effective framework.
However, we need to go beyond even that, the the principles under which many countries were founded and/or operate. There needs to be some form of “special prosecutor”, who can: (1) indict upon reasonable cause; (2) set bail and conditions; (3) procure a speedy trial; (4) with swift and sure justice assured; (5) WITHOUT INTERFERENCE FROM KNOW-NOTHING APPELLATE BODIES.
There appear to be serious conflicts of interest in just who “guards the hen house”, and my research just today indicates that it may be a fox, or a fox in disguise. There are fiduciary obligations that are apparently not being met, and that is beyond the pale to this one of many who have been affected by known, sociopath cheaters.
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
My partners love it, Dave!
I can't recall the last penalty from a weak-2, but do have memories of many, many pluses as a result.
(One partner had to be heavily persuaded to try my weak-2s, and finally agreed in the middle of a Swiss team. We crushed the next opponent by 60 IMPS, with 5 weak-2s contributing to the slaughter . . . after that, he was a convert!)
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Rena -
The professional community, as you're probably aware, would rise in concerted and vigorous opposition to a reduction in paydays.
This raises the question as to who, exactly, is the clientele we're promoting and assisting? Just asking, as I certainly don't have the definitive answer . . .
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Many topics rolled into one Post, Rena!
One thought - starting all major team games on Day 1 will likely reduce entries, perhaps considerably. Although professional teams now win all these events, other teams form during the tournament. Also, entries are typically due the night before . . .
My strong opposition to drop-ins, and particularly to granting “free carryover” is well known.
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I disagree completely Lior, while respecting your opinion and view.
It is my very strong belief that, if it's possible to conduct an entire NABC in the ACBL, and ultimately end with no titled champions, then something is rotten in Denmark.
What is the point of holding major events, if the participants may never have access to winning the event?
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Unless, Mike, the lead a ♣ (which was stated, I believe), and the ♣Jx is in RHO. If Declarer doesn't rise with an honor (rising is probably right), then the ♣9 sets up for a trick.
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
In all of this, it may be important to note that, these days, a 1-level overcall could also be on a 4-card suit.
I agree with Mreijn, in that none of my partnership's new suits are forcing (and not with Henry's treatment), hence my 2♣ call as a general force. This may flush out a real ♠ fit, or allow me to follow with 2NT (or 3NT if partner jumps).
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Jean-Charles: Thanks for explaining the EBL Index, your comments make complete sense, so the weaker teams pay much less, and that seems to be very good business! Good luck with the entire event, just wanted to understand it completely :)
Gary Hann
Gary Hann
Gary Hann
As Chris notes, the SEC has set an effective framework.
However, we need to go beyond even that, the the principles under which many countries were founded and/or operate. There needs to be some form of “special prosecutor”, who can:
(1) indict upon reasonable cause;
(2) set bail and conditions;
(3) procure a speedy trial;
(4) with swift and sure justice assured;
(5) WITHOUT INTERFERENCE FROM KNOW-NOTHING APPELLATE BODIES.
There appear to be serious conflicts of interest in just who “guards the hen house”, and my research just today indicates that it may be a fox, or a fox in disguise. There are fiduciary obligations that are apparently not being met, and that is beyond the pale to this one of many who have been affected by known, sociopath cheaters.
Gary Hann
Gary Hann
I can't recall the last penalty from a weak-2, but do have memories of many, many pluses as a result.
(One partner had to be heavily persuaded to try my weak-2s, and finally agreed in the middle of a Swiss team. We crushed the next opponent by 60 IMPS, with 5 weak-2s contributing to the slaughter . . . after that, he was a convert!)
Gary Hann
On the first hand, just how do I “pick up” that ♠ void? :)
In my partnerships, we open all weak 2's, defined as “bad hands”, and the first qualifies, with the potential added protection of being 6-5.
On the second, I could care less whether LHO is aggressive, or a wimp, I play my game, and it's been effective, against all comers!
Gary Hann
The professional community, as you're probably aware, would rise in concerted and vigorous opposition to a reduction in paydays.
This raises the question as to who, exactly, is the clientele we're promoting and assisting? Just asking, as I certainly don't have the definitive answer . . .
Gary Hann
(Couldn't help it J/K)
Gary Hann
Gary Hann
One thought - starting all major team games on Day 1 will likely reduce entries, perhaps considerably. Although professional teams now win all these events, other teams form during the tournament. Also, entries are typically due the night before . . .
My strong opposition to drop-ins, and particularly to granting “free carryover” is well known.
Gary Hann
It is my very strong belief that, if it's possible to conduct an entire NABC in the ACBL, and ultimately end with no titled champions, then something is rotten in Denmark.
What is the point of holding major events, if the participants may never have access to winning the event?
Gary Hann
Thanks for chiming in on yet another unmitigated disaster.
My position on this, and other abject ACBL failures, is well known and widely disseminated.
The fact that nobody in Management seems to care is particularly troubling . . .
Gary Hann
Gary Hann
3NT/1X = 15-17 HCP, balanced. It's the perfect bid here.
Gary Hann
Gary Hann
I agree with Mreijn, in that none of my partnership's new suits are forcing (and not with Henry's treatment), hence my 2♣ call as a general force. This may flush out a real ♠ fit, or allow me to follow with 2NT (or 3NT if partner jumps).
Gary Hann
Gary Hann
Gary Hann
Thanks, Mike, for spotting and posting this.
The bridge - Olympic interconnection, however it's structured, makes Olympic actions relevant to bridge.
Gary Hann
If Linda Dunn was the only scribe and overseer of the employment contract for Mr. Jones, something is indeed rotten in Denmark . . .