Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Harald Berre Skjæran
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Max Bavin, I suppose?
March 3, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
If you divide by the number of tables, you Get +9.9 for bidding the slam and -1.1 for staying in game in the example you look at. The difference is 11 IMPs, which is mathematically correct.
March 3, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
East was on lead.
March 2, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The ten second pause after the skip bid should me more than plenty to decide.
March 2, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
As others I'd have bid 7 over 5NT. Now I bid 7.
Feb. 28, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I really don't understand this. I've played Acolish systems for ages before changing to a 2/1 version some years ago. A jump shift or a junp rebid by opener after 2/1 (10+) has always been GF in my book. I understand that it's very different in England from what we're been doing here in Norway.
Feb. 28, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
If double doesn't show a GF hand with hearts, I don't understand the logic used. Anyway, I haven't got a double, whatever it means. The hand doesn't fit a t/o double, nor do I think I have the strength for a cooperative double.

To me the choise is between pass an 3. I might be overbidding with RHO having a strong hand with hearts and clubs, possibly 4-5. I'm bidding 3, though.
Feb. 28, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
But why would we reach 6 vs that hand? I'd definitely go to 6NT as long as pd didn't superaccept nor support s.
Feb. 28, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
But responder will bid 6NT after partner didn't superaccept or support diamonds. 6NT is very close to 50%, thus not a great slam. But still OK.
Feb. 28, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
4 is the only way to set spades now, except bidding 4. I`m too strong for that.
Feb. 26, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Bob; read the OP again. Partner opened 1, he already showed 5.
Feb. 26, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
When did I see I had piller the wrong card from the bidding box? If that was before parner passed, I could lawfully (L25A) have changed my bid to 2 without any consequences.
Feb. 26, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I'd have opened 1NT, not too hard to foresee this development. I'm far too strong to rebid 1NT.
Feb. 26, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Declarer has an entry to dummy to play like this. That's got to be by playing the trump deuce to dummy. Thus you know he's got 7-8 spades.
Feb. 24, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Partner showed an iinv+ raise. 3 is OK with me, I've got a six loser hand, but not enough to bid more IMO.

I'd expect the next two bids to show stoppers initially. And pards 3NT a suggestion to play there after I showed a heart stopper. That's fine with me.
Feb. 24, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
AQx Ax AKJxxx xxx is only 18 hcp, and 6 is great! I really think you need to show your diamond suit now. I still expect the field to reach slam here, and think 4NT to be just too little.
Feb. 24, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
This one I thought would be unanimous. But Bob is the odd man out this far.
Feb. 24, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
With 20% so far voting for passing, pass obviously is a logical alternative. Thus you're compelled to pass after partner's BIT, the laws are absolutely clear on this. I voted for double, but have changed this to pass.
Feb. 24, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Why didn't I lead a trump?
Feb. 24, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I'd expect the field to reach slam here.
Feb. 23, 2013
.

Bottom Home Top