Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Harald Berre Skjæran
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
No sci-fi. Dbl is penalties, pass is forcing; partner decides. 4NT is to play, something like Ax Kx KQxxxx Axx.
Jan. 31, 2019
ATB
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Peg, I’d raise to 3 with that one. But there are hands where we’ll play a game in a partscore. I do, however, believe the upside is larger than the downside. For starters, my partner knows I’m 55+ when I jump shift, making further bidding MUCH easier than for all the fake jump shifters.
Jan. 30, 2019
ATB
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
My fault, you’re pretty clear above. I skipped your «not» when reading the response.
Jan. 30, 2019
ATB
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Why, Peg?

Seems more «natural» that since we’re in a force, there’s no need for it to be non-natural. Especially since we’re jumping in non suits, it’s imperative to be able to find the suits we might have.
Jan. 30, 2019
ATB
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Actually, I’d rebid 2. That’s almost forcing for me, partner will only pass with 1-3 and a sub minimum respons.
Jan. 30, 2019
ATB
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
North’s bidding looks like 4-6 to me, 3, to be followed by 4 if possible, is far better, IMO.

Personally, I strongly dislike the fake jump shift, and don’t at all understand 4. Thus I voted about equal blame.
Jan. 30, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
If you’ve got the habit to think forward in the auction, both when it’s your time to bid and when opponents are in turn, you’ll be prepared for much of what’s happening. The 5 bid here isn’t exactly sensational, IMO. When you decided to bid 5 last round, you should also think about what to do next round.
Jan. 29, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
John, you can’t impose a general rule regarding what is a BIT in this situation, it’s totally player dependent. A two second pause here for me, would definitely be a BIT, I’d make a call in my usual 0.5-1 second (unless playin on home ground, where a ten second pause is mandatory).
Jan. 28, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Abstained. The questions asked in the poll is totally off regarding the hand I hold. I have an automatic pass here, whatever partner did or didn’t do can never change that fact.

If anyone didn’t pass here after a BIT by partner, I’d take that as clear evidence that the player involved knew exactly why partner hesitated. And rule accordingly.
Jan. 26, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Make sense of east’s auction??? Do you really expect east to nearly always pass here? I don’t, he’ll bid with distribution and pass only with a (semi)balanced hand. The double isn’t for penalties.
Jan. 25, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
2 natural, 2 Blacks, 1NT 15-18.
Jan. 24, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I don’t see how you were damaged here, whatever their true agreement, if any, was.

East thought 3 was invitational, and would obviously pass 3 if you do the same. You can’t force him to bid game, whatever the agreement was.
Jan. 24, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
A heart at IMPs, spade at MP.
Jan. 23, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Responder could have bid 4 to set trumps, followed by KC next round.

Playing in a regular partnership, no other meaning than quantitative would occur to me.
Jan. 20, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Well done, congratulations!
Jan. 20, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
If I've got eleven spades to the jack, I'd like to know what spot card I've got two of…
Jan. 18, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Canape? DB’s description doesn’t look like canape to me, I infer that they open 1 with (42)25, but 1M with (42)34 outside the 1NT range.
Jan. 16, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Had to abstain, failing to bid 4 last round.
Jan. 16, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I would play your two first sequences as natural. The last as a sound spade raise.

(1) - 2 I play as Michaels.
Jan. 15, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
After 2-2NT i prefer:
3=max; 3 relay, opener bids his non-suit
3red=min transfer; completion of transfer by responder is INV
Jan. 12, 2019
.

Bottom Home Top