Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Harald Berre Skjæran
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
4 would be natural, IMO. After a 2 opening, a new lower ranking suit is natural at the 4-level; a higher ranking suit is control showing. A rule I learned some 35 years ago.
Jan. 31
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
No sci-fi. Dbl is penalties, pass is forcing; partner decides. 4NT is to play, something like Ax Kx KQxxxx Axx.
Jan. 31
ATB
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Peg, I’d raise to 3 with that one. But there are hands where we’ll play a game in a partscore. I do, however, believe the upside is larger than the downside. For starters, my partner knows I’m 55+ when I jump shift, making further bidding MUCH easier than for all the fake jump shifters.
Jan. 30
ATB
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
My fault, you’re pretty clear above. I skipped your «not» when reading the response.
Jan. 30
ATB
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Why, Peg?

Seems more «natural» that since we’re in a force, there’s no need for it to be non-natural. Especially since we’re jumping in non suits, it’s imperative to be able to find the suits we might have.
Jan. 30
ATB
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Actually, I’d rebid 2. That’s almost forcing for me, partner will only pass with 1-3 and a sub minimum respons.
Jan. 30
ATB
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
North’s bidding looks like 4-6 to me, 3, to be followed by 4 if possible, is far better, IMO.

Personally, I strongly dislike the fake jump shift, and don’t at all understand 4. Thus I voted about equal blame.
Jan. 30
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
If you’ve got the habit to think forward in the auction, both when it’s your time to bid and when opponents are in turn, you’ll be prepared for much of what’s happening. The 5 bid here isn’t exactly sensational, IMO. When you decided to bid 5 last round, you should also think about what to do next round.
Jan. 29
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
John, you can’t impose a general rule regarding what is a BIT in this situation, it’s totally player dependent. A two second pause here for me, would definitely be a BIT, I’d make a call in my usual 0.5-1 second (unless playin on home ground, where a ten second pause is mandatory).
Jan. 28
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Abstained. The questions asked in the poll is totally off regarding the hand I hold. I have an automatic pass here, whatever partner did or didn’t do can never change that fact.

If anyone didn’t pass here after a BIT by partner, I’d take that as clear evidence that the player involved knew exactly why partner hesitated. And rule accordingly.
Jan. 26
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Make sense of east’s auction??? Do you really expect east to nearly always pass here? I don’t, he’ll bid with distribution and pass only with a (semi)balanced hand. The double isn’t for penalties.
Jan. 25
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
2 natural, 2 Blacks, 1NT 15-18.
Jan. 24
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I don’t see how you were damaged here, whatever their true agreement, if any, was.

East thought 3 was invitational, and would obviously pass 3 if you do the same. You can’t force him to bid game, whatever the agreement was.
Jan. 24
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
A heart at IMPs, spade at MP.
Jan. 23
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Responder could have bid 4 to set trumps, followed by KC next round.

Playing in a regular partnership, no other meaning than quantitative would occur to me.
Jan. 20
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Well done, congratulations!
Jan. 20
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
If I've got eleven spades to the jack, I'd like to know what spot card I've got two of…
Jan. 18
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Canape? DB’s description doesn’t look like canape to me, I infer that they open 1 with (42)25, but 1M with (42)34 outside the 1NT range.
Jan. 16
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Had to abstain, failing to bid 4 last round.
Jan. 16
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I would play your two first sequences as natural. The last as a sound spade raise.

(1) - 2 I play as Michaels.
Jan. 15
.

Bottom Home Top