Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Harald Berre Skjæran
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
We’ve had three sets for years. Normally 4-7 tables. With seven it’s too few. So recently changed to four sets. That’s ok with eight tables too, and workable with nine also. Haven’t seen eight tables yet, but might well do, espescially coming summer.
Feb. 26
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
In my local club we always play 27 boards (9x3), unless we're four tables, when we play 28 boards (7x4). We always play barometer, except when our duplimate is away for service. Then we play Howell.

The barometer movement is exactly like a Howell, except all play the same boards at the same time.

Mitchell movements are extinct in Norway (or 99.9 % dead).
Feb. 26
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
And you’ve never seen the auction
1m (2) x (4)
p (p)
and responder’s got that GF hand with five spades?
Feb. 23
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
For me, the same, except 11-14, since our 1NT is 15-17.
Feb. 22
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
1-1, 2 promise six.
1-1, 2 promise five; 4-5 red to weak to reverse or six.
Feb. 15
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I find it ridiculous to allow written defenses in high level competition. It’s OK for beginners and advancing players at club level, IMO. But not beyond that.
Feb. 12
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Whether it introduces a significant problem for the TD depends on what scoring program is used.

We use Tomas Brenning’s Ruter (Magic Contest), where this is trivial to handle.
Feb. 12
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Nobody said change is always for the better. Comparable Call is definitely a big leap forward. Far more hands are allowed to be played normally than was the case before this change. It’s true some hands are complicated, for TDs and players, but still it’s far better than it used to be.
Feb. 6
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I agree that a club switch at trick two is the correct defense.
Feb. 6
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
In the diagram you’ve played two rounds of diamonds, all following.
Feb. 5
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
4 would be natural, IMO. After a 2 opening, a new lower ranking suit is natural at the 4-level; a higher ranking suit is control showing. A rule I learned some 35 years ago.
Jan. 31
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
No sci-fi. Dbl is penalties, pass is forcing; partner decides. 4NT is to play, something like Ax Kx KQxxxx Axx.
Jan. 31
ATB
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Peg, I’d raise to 3 with that one. But there are hands where we’ll play a game in a partscore. I do, however, believe the upside is larger than the downside. For starters, my partner knows I’m 55+ when I jump shift, making further bidding MUCH easier than for all the fake jump shifters.
Jan. 30
ATB
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
My fault, you’re pretty clear above. I skipped your «not» when reading the response.
Jan. 30
ATB
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Why, Peg?

Seems more «natural» that since we’re in a force, there’s no need for it to be non-natural. Especially since we’re jumping in non suits, it’s imperative to be able to find the suits we might have.
Jan. 30
ATB
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Actually, I’d rebid 2. That’s almost forcing for me, partner will only pass with 1-3 and a sub minimum respons.
Jan. 30
ATB
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
North’s bidding looks like 4-6 to me, 3, to be followed by 4 if possible, is far better, IMO.

Personally, I strongly dislike the fake jump shift, and don’t at all understand 4. Thus I voted about equal blame.
Jan. 30
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
If you’ve got the habit to think forward in the auction, both when it’s your time to bid and when opponents are in turn, you’ll be prepared for much of what’s happening. The 5 bid here isn’t exactly sensational, IMO. When you decided to bid 5 last round, you should also think about what to do next round.
Jan. 29
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
John, you can’t impose a general rule regarding what is a BIT in this situation, it’s totally player dependent. A two second pause here for me, would definitely be a BIT, I’d make a call in my usual 0.5-1 second (unless playin on home ground, where a ten second pause is mandatory).
Jan. 28
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Abstained. The questions asked in the poll is totally off regarding the hand I hold. I have an automatic pass here, whatever partner did or didn’t do can never change that fact.

If anyone didn’t pass here after a BIT by partner, I’d take that as clear evidence that the player involved knew exactly why partner hesitated. And rule accordingly.
Jan. 26
.

Bottom Home Top