Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Helena Dawson
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Helene, you are so right. What an extremely generous gesture to get up at the crack of dawn to play against us. Kate, your ceaseless energy and generosity continue to abound. Thank you.
May 24
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Partner opened 1H as N. East doubled and I toyed with 2c drury. Luckily I came to my senses and bid 4H making 10. Concentrating on BBO is extra challenge not sure why. Maybe partly because it all happens much faster
May 15
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
My view is that north should bid 3spades over 3 hearts without it promising any more than a balanced 12 count. By not doing so it makes it very difficult to know what to do after the next double. Obviously this is just a matter of system agreement but that is my agreement when I am playing a strong club
May 15
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
.
May 11
Helena Dawson edited this comment May 11
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
It's a pity you switched cards Kate. Rena will realise with her spades that you don't want spades and maybe will therefore realise it was suit preference any way!
April 23
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
At our table Helene opened 1S which I like. Bidding went 1S-2H-2S-2NT (enquiry) - 4S. Liz, I agree that voids make the hand potentially very powerful. I am interested in your reasoning behind preferring to preempt with 7042 as opposed to 7033?
April 23
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
It’s so nice to know you are still there ! Best of luck in China. May the bid be with you! Xx
April 5
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I agree. I should take the club fitnesse
April 4
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I agree Avril.. I should have bid 5c.
April 3
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
At our table Helene doubled the 1C and I jumped to 2D showing less than opening values but 5-card suit. This was enough for Helene to jump to 3NT, played safely for 9 tricks.
April 2
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
We do have an agreement here. The opps have shown both majors so we can bid 2D natural non-forcing, 2H good clubs, 2S good diamonds and 3D natural non-forcing with longer diamond suit. X is general values. So, I think North should bid 2D.
March 27
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Unfortunately we were a bit aggressive on this board. Helene doubled with the North hand and after East's 4H I bid 4S! Swap the King of diamonds with the king of spades and we might even engineer 4S making. Despite North's soft values, I do like the general principle of taking action immediately but on this hand I would probably have passed. 4S is also a bit pushy.
March 27
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Play strong club and open 1C
March 26
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
If partner bids 4H over 4D I have enough to give it one more push with 4NT. When I hear she has the A and Q hearts I can see 12 tricks. 7 still seems dangerous. In all honesty I'm not totally sure we'll get there. In 2/1 we'd easily get there because I know the hearts are a really good suit.
March 25
Helena Dawson edited this comment March 25
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
We don't play 2/1 so have a different problem. I certainly like a jump to 3H in 2/1 to be setting the suit. In Helene and my system the jump promises around 14hcp. It doesn't have to be a solid heart suit - could be same as above but with AQxxxx. On the assumption we don't introduce a new suit at the 4-level, I think we would have to bid 4C as natural (forcing) and 4D as agreeing on hearts and a cue bid. 3S would be natural but not a bid you'd actually make on this hand.
So the bidding would go

1H-2C
3H-4D
4S-4NT
5s-5NT
6D-7C
7H-7NT

7C would be a suggestion to play there.

Can anyone suggest a better way of bidding if playing our system rather than 2/1?
March 25
Helena Dawson edited this comment March 25
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Do you mean 6D Helene?
March 25
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I’m not sure why south should duck a diamond. Play ace or king then a small one. You might end up making all 5 diamond tricks. If north only has 2 diamonds ducking wont help.
March 21
Helena Dawson edited this comment March 21
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Thanks Kate! This is perfect.
March 17
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I would bid 2H at this vul (5H 4 minor). Why not?
March 16
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I should bid 3H not 3D. They have shown 2 suits so a bid of one of the suits shows stoppers. From my perspective 3NT is still a viable option.
March 16
.

Bottom Home Top