Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Helene Thygesen
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
When we have a double fit, don't we play 6-ace blackwood?
Oct. 21, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Yes, Phillip's comment about shortness in opps' suit is very important. With some length in opps' suit you can be reasonably confident that partner will bid, unless he is weak in which case the board obviously belongs to opps anyway.
Oct. 21, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
A 3-level preempt has the playing strength of an opening, so bidding (3)-3 on a semibalanced 15-count as well as an 8-count with a 7-card suit is OK, I think.
Oct. 20, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
There was a recent article in the Dutch magazine “IMP” by Maarten Schollard, where the author argued for “weak over weak”, for example (2)-3. Strong hands would have to double, then. I am not sure exactly when it would apply, though, as there are situations in which double followed by a change of suit just shows a flexible hand, so the jump overcall is the only way to show a strong 1-suited hand.

I am not convinced about the merits of weak-over-weak, and I find the arguments by Ron and Nigel more compelling, but apparently it is a matter of partnership agreement.

There could be a rational for preempting over certain multi-bids such a 2 showing either a weak hand with diamonds or an Acol-ish 2, though.

Also, somewhat depending on vulnerability and whether partner is a passed hand, I think (4)-4 should have a very wide range and include some hands where you would have opened with a preempt yourself.
Oct. 20, 2019
Helene Thygesen edited this comment Oct. 20, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Standard is invitational in most places but I prefer to play it as forcing, even without WJS. I am not sure if WJS is so relevant anyway as you could still have a weak hand with 64
Oct. 9, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The range of 3 has a slightly wider ranger than the unopposed jump rebid, so I think it makes sense to play it as something like 7-9 with a good 6-card suit. Not forcing, but constructive.

Good question, by the way.
Oct. 6, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Can we get out in 2 after partner's 1NT rebid? Not that it matters for this decision, I bid 1 regardless. But it wouldn't surprise me if 1NT is the long term winner.
Sept. 26, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
We were once disadvantaged by this - partner had six good clubs but obviously couldn't bid them naturally after they transfered to clubs.

It really isn't rocket science - just follow the rule always to say what a bid shows, never to use convention names.

Everyone above the kitchen bridge level should know better (and if you play kitchen bridge you don't alert, you just let the player who bid 2 explain how he meant it).
Sept. 23, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I always found it weird. When we have already announced (near) GF strength, I would think the priority should be to sort out fit and O/D.
It makes more sense when they preempt over a strong 1 but even then I would prefer to play pass as ostensibly penalty and double as optional.
Sept. 14, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Thanks. Yes of course
Sept. 13, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
If we don't play Lebensohl, I think we need to play this as nonforcing. What else with 4216 10-count?

Maybe we could play that double followed by 3 is weaker. But sometimes we don't want to double because we can't tolerate a 3 bid or a pass.

My prefered agreement is to bid Lebensohl with 8-10(11) points and a GF natural 3 bid. Transfers may be more efficient in terms of bidding space but with LHO having made an overcall we prefer to declare ourselves.
Sept. 10, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
We rarely open very light in 3rd seat (and obviously not in 4th either), but Drury is still useful:
- With a flat 12 count you don't want partner to raise to the 3-level as the tactical advantage of doing so is small now that both opps have passed. Especially when we have spades, there's a decent chance we will be allowed to play a safe 2
- With a flat 6-count, it is better to raise than to use 1NT, especially as a passed hand since 1NT isn't forcing. Putting the flat 9-counts in Drury allows us to raise with some ugly hands that would have used the forcing 1NT in 1st/2nd.
Aug. 29, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Yes but you wouldn't have bid 2 with that holding.
Aug. 26, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
This may depend on the rest of the hand. If I have nothing outside the suit, it may be reasonable to lead small in case partner has Jx or Ax. If I have plenty outside the suit, the king is normal.

Ten would be very strange and Queen only if we do this systematically, or if K=count, A/Q=attitude
Aug. 15, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Also: what would 1NT show now?
Aug. 13, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Take-out of hearts is the agreement I have with the only p with whom I have discussed it.

Reasons why it is more interesting to suggest spades than hearts as a possible strain:
- Opener has exactly four spades. Responder could easily have 5+ hearts.
- If it's a total misfit, partner can sometimes leave the double in and it is opps rather than us who is in troubles. OTOH, partner can almost never convert a double that is t/o of spades, so it will force us to play on a board where nobody wants to play.
- Defending spades at the 1-level requires 7 tricks. 2 requires 8.
- We might want to compete to 2 over 2. We are unlikely to want to compete to 3 over 2
- Partner has little so if my hearts are in front of responder's hearts, we don't want to get involved in this auction. With four decent spades behind opener's suit, OTOH, the board might belong to us.
Aug. 12, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I voted 3 to get partner to show a club stopper or a 4-card major. But maybe 2NT is better. If partner has J9xx and lefty KQTx(x), the contract is better played in my hand.

2 is also OK. I am a bit concerned that 3NT maybe be better even with a 5-3 fit in spades, or that partner may raise on a doubleton. But neither of those are likely to happen.
Aug. 11, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I think 2 is worse than all the options listed. It doesn't describe the hand very well and doesn't disturb the opps much either. If a Ghestem bid was available so I could at least tell partner about the clubs it would be better, but even then I prefer just bidding spades.

Opposite a passed partner and not vulnerable, I don't like 1 much either. It's too toothless. I suppose 3 is normal but 4 could easily work better. West may have an easy 4 bid over 3 but have a problem over 4.
Aug. 1, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Interesting, my first thought was that 7 when p might have only second round heart control is a bit optimistic. But he is probably right - 6 with no better than Kxxxxx must mean he also has A
July 18, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I just made up a gadget: 4 is a transfer to hearts, while 4 shows four hearts and another place to play, ostensibly four spades.

Alternatively, discuss with p what the difference is between a fast 5 and a slow one (going through 4, or maybe 4NT if that isn't natural).

Without specific partnership agreements I will assume that 4NT is natural, the slow 5 is a general slam try with doubt about the strain (could be 5 5, maybe?), so 5 it is. Unfortunately it doesn't show or ask for anything specific but at least I have transfered the blame :)
July 16, 2019
.

Bottom Home Top