Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Jean Harings
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
We didn't create a GF situation, so pass looks obvious to me.
Dec. 8, 2019
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
not that big none vulnerable..
July 31, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
4NT take out, not RKCB in my system. but my next 5D will be a slamtry
July 12, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I would surely bid 3D but I don't know if 2S is played forcing. Look's like it.
May 10, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
2D, looks like a misfit. 2D gives west room to show his spadefit like bidding 3S showing 4 which will be great for me.
Dec. 2, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
redbl won't get much help from partner, pas may work better.
I would have opened 2C, rebidding NT (22-23)
Nov. 30, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Partner didnt dbl on a heart lead, thats for sure, he didnt know 5S was coming.
Both opp.(bidding on 5 level) might have a void in hearts, so ace of hearts is the most dangerous lead
Partner must have overall values. Diamond lead stands out for me… but still could be wrong :)
Nov. 7, 2016
Jean Harings edited this comment Nov. 7, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
declarer doesnt have clubs, just one rather unlikely
So club leads might only help declarer
Nov. 7, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The double felt not fine (ODR indeed low) but with no specific agreement it would most likely should show some values, that's what I hoped it would.
IMO, I have no clear penalty dbl, as some suggest (pas first, then dbl)
Nov. 7, 2016
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Probably the 2 imp decision is a result of some split scores. South''s 5 bid should cost some points.
Aug. 15, 2015
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.


Dec. 4, 2013
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
with a fit this hand will be good for game most of the time. Without the fifth an extra Ace or King would be required
Dec. 4, 2013
.

Bottom Home Top