Join Bridge Winners
All comments by John Portwood
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 196 197 198 199
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Oh well - maybe they should read http://bridgewinners.com/article/view/placing-the-cards-2-i4j6oerma7/ as a primer then.
Oct. 13
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
the NGS in EBU have two sets of ratings - individual (by area) and partnership (national only).

Being able to get good results out of a poor partner is an integral part of bridge and a player that can do so reaps their reward in a higher NGS ranking.
Oct. 12
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I would go for support xs and xxs (still not common in the UK) and IIRC drury was banned in the UK as a psychic control. Transfer responses to 1 were certainly not popular at all.
Oct. 12
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Maybe I am doing myself an injustice - I thought that intermediates (at least those who come to this site and thus have a desire to improve) would know that there are such things as squeezes - and hands that come around illustrating squeeze defence don't come up that often.

This is, after all, eventually only a positional squeeze (switch N and S hands and the squeeze wouldn't work even if the JH was led.) (If any intermediates are reading - the reason is that the menaces (K single, A9 extended) would then NOT be in the UPPER hand i.e. BL(U)E fails.)
Oct. 12
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I hate the NGS - I was ranked as an Ace (of clubs), now I'm just a Queen. Obviously my bridge skill is diminishing with anno domini.
Oct. 11
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
No doubt West asked what the 2 call meant . . .
Oct. 11
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Anytime you get below par score our grade drops - which makes it a bit easier to get back up again. It is self-correcting.

The one thing I have noticed is that the change in percentage in results is not linear - it is much harder IMHO to go up from e.g. 65% to 70% in a session than to go up from 50% to 55% in a session. The NGS does not reflect this - the amount you score above your predicted result is prcessed in a linear manner.
Oct. 10
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
At my table I passed partner's 2 Club response - however 2 clubs goes off. It was on reviewing the hand in the bar afterwards that I spotted the suitability of the hand for an article - provided the final contract was 2 Spades.

If you want to check - it is hand 22 http://www.stgeorgesbridge.co.uk/Results/Oct19/191009r.htm

I am not sure how the play went at all the tables of course - and maybe the bidding went 1 - 2 - 2. For instance a club might have been led - although the proposed order of play seems reasonable.

(Another pointer that East has the A is that they didn't switch to a diamond at trick two ot three - but that is also irrelevant to the discussion).

I intended this to go into the intermediate forum - but I misposted - oh well.
Oct. 10
John Portwood edited this comment Oct. 10
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
That can cause problems BUT the EBU own article on the NGS myths https://www.ebu.co.uk/documents/miscellaneous/ngs/clark-article.pdf may help.
Oct. 10
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Which version?

NGS - gives current performance for club players

Masterpoints - lifetime achievement or how much money have you spent to attend events.

Gold Masterpoints - awarded in the top competitions and degrade over time - to rate the very best players on their current form.

(As an offsett - I find the NGS stops frivolous psyching etc, which is to the benefit of all players. You don't mess around if you attach a high NGS grade as asign of virility.)
Oct. 9
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Because players (especially novices) don't like changing direction at different tables in different rounds - believe me - I've tried it!
Oct. 7
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I've run this through on Jeanie - if I am right (big if) you do best not to arrowswitch table 3. This gets a balance of 72% (compared to a 11 table hesitation which is 81%).

(We usually get 6 or 7 tables so run a share and relay (bye-stand) with one arrowswitch or a straightforward 7 table Mitchell but play only 6 rounds with one arrowswitched.), but I agree that 18 boards is enough for a novices and a hesitation is much more easy for them to use.
Oct. 7
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I suppose it depends where the office is. I have the computer about 6 feet from where I sit (I usually have the round monitor options shown so I can spot slow tables and know when to call the round - usually when two tables are still in play).

I don't like using the suspicious scores feature - the problem being that I will get extraneous information about the hands. Which means that my partner is unlikely to be able to play the board. Since I am usually playing with a pick-up partner when directing, I believe it more encouraging for them to enjoy playing the whole event. (Sometimes of course the suspicious score turns out to be nothing of the sort). This is one reason why I like the enter-opening-lead option enabled.
Oct. 5
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I find that:

1) Players have readily accepted entering opening leads.
2) It prevents incorrect scoring.
3) Entering the lead hardly takes any time. My only request is that North makes the opening lead (when their turn) before entering contract details into the bridgemates
4) We use duplimating machines so can upload the file to the bridgemate server (through EBUScore) (this also allows me time to review the hands the novices will be playing on Monday)
5) This Monday we have switched to pbn format from dup format so there will be a hand analysis function (I hope) working.

Maybe in the UK we are more accepting and tolerant of change and technology.
Oct. 4
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Last night in a spade trump contract declarer led the KD from KJXXX. Partner (holding the Ace) - ducked assuming declarer was trying to set up the suit. Declarer then led a low diamond and my partner went up with the Ace, aiming to block the suit - but the LOL ruffed.
Oct. 4
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
EBU guidelines quite clearly assume that asking a question can legitimately wake-up opponents - so obviously means it is AI.
Oct. 3
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
An ‘extremely serious error unrelated to the infraction’ to be precise (or a gambling action which this clearly wasn;t).

ESEs are often indicated as other breaches of the laws e.g. revokes, LOOTs or e.g. bidding on in a suit that has been doubled for penalty.

IMHO we look at “What would NS have done with the correct information?” rather than ‘NS should have worked out the incorrect information".

Can’t see any reason at all to award a split verdict. There may be a weighted verdict in that NS are more likely to finesse the Q given correct information, but were not certain to do so. Say 75-25 in favour.
Oct. 2
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Personally, I think that there is no need to disclose the traits of your partner - to read law 20

“During the auction and before the final pass any player may request7, at his own turn to call,an explanation of the opponents’ auction. He is entitled to know about calls actually made, about relevant alternative calls available that were not made, and about inferences from the choice of action where these are matters of partnership understanding.”

I would do so if I was going to ‘field’ the misbid, but purely to avoid a possible misexplanation call.
Sept. 27
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Whilst the OP definitely made the right call, I don't think he was ‘super ethical’. Ethical certainly - but you can't heap extra praise on someone for merely following the rules of the game.
Sept. 26
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Will USA 1?

Of course they will! Mind you Norway have been very impressive.
Sept. 23
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 196 197 198 199
.

Bottom Home Top