Join Bridge Winners
All comments by John Wilmott
1 2 3 4 ... 15 16 17 18
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Hi Alan, 50 pairs can play mp's one day, imps the next, BAM the following, teams on Saturday and total points on Sunday.
May 4
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Hi Steve, Have an event by all means that is only 4-Handed. The more variety of events the better.
May 4
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I am pretty confident that you have not understood the point I was promulgating. My point, admittedly fairly succinct, was to promote the virtues of professionalism. I think it is a good thing. Hence my defence of the six-handed team. The best teams are all sponsored, players have to make a living.
May 3
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Play with a six-handed team. A good preparation for international events. It would also damage the professionalism of the game which in turn would hurt the competitiveness of US bridge. Think of the Nickell Team.
May 3
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
It is up to the international community now. The supranational bodies such as the WBF, EBL, ACBL, etc., should withdraw invitations if a parochial court overturns the verdict of a country's National Bridge Federation.

German bridge players, good luck to them, might boycott any national event the spluttering doctors decide to enter as players. Some might decide, with good reason, that they have served a partial sentence. It should, of course, be verboten for them to play as a pair.

I don't know if they ever played on a sponsored team, if so I would assume those arrangements are now over. This is important because the coughing doctors might make a claim for loss of earnings. Such a ruling would make such a petition redundant.
April 28
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Another good point. I was referring to his many matchpoint victories in national European tournaments.
April 11
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
You have a point, but few have won so many titles…
April 11
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Martin Hoffman should have been on the inaugural list in my view.
April 9
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Fourth Suit Forcing allows one to play Fifth suit forcing: http://bridgewinners.com/article/view/fifth-suit-forcing/ Keep the convention.
April 2
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I am pretty sure that their will be a Dutch quartet with children in tow who will be taking a vacation on the Cote d'Azur this summer somewhere west of Menton.
March 28
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I do wonder who will replace Fantoni-Nunes in the Monaco team…
March 28
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Suppose you test one round of clubs first, and west shows out, is it best to play the double finesse in diamonds now?
March 27
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
There has to a high degree of rigour in this sort of situation, as close to bulletproof as possible. With the benefit of the doubt in favour of the accused.

There will be plenty here advocating for BZ who will scrutinise the evidence with punishing rigour.

No one wants to see a witch hunt.
March 18
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
It is better that a codebreaker has a sustainable hypothesis that is tested. It would be pointless if we have to keep starting from zero.
March 18
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Richard, many will overlook what are seemingly innocuous mannerism. It takes hours of careful observation to detect a pattern.

Once the pattern is codified by a codebreaker, it is better to try and disprove what has been postulated by another.
March 18
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Hi Oleg, My criticism is not aimed at Boye, of course not, what he has done for the game may pay dividends for decades. Tend to agree with your secondary point; that the authorities knew the bridge world suspected F/S for years and chose not to investigate. Boye took real risks, his career, a litany of lawsuits, and the possibility of being subject to a substantial ban.

I was unaware of a ‘plea bargain’ arrangement made with a third party. If such an agreement had been agreed and had been posted here in the past, I apologise for resurrecting the issue. I do not have a problem with such a course of action. Cheating is as corrosive to the game as steroids are to Athletics.

Just how close ‘deep throat’ came to identifying the methodology employed by B/Z would be of more than a passing interest.
Feb. 22
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
OK Gene, three years ago you might have been aware of the gossip surrounding BZ, I was not, sorry. To my mind they were a pair in good standing. I just thought that Balicki was a slightly unpleasant opponent with the persona of a bad tempered nightclub bouncer, whereas Zmudzinski was a highly cultured individual. I would be shocked if many placed them in the same category as Fisher-Schwartz. Maybe I am drawing an unfounded conclusion, I am sure you mix in more elevated circles than I do.

I have nothing but the utmost respect for those who through extraordinary diligence uncovered the malfeasance that has contaminated the game.

I do think one is entitled to ask why one pair has come under so much scrutiny as opposed to fifty other top partnerships? If they are working to a list drawn up by a statistician maybe the time has come to present the list and the data for the sake of transparency.
Feb. 22
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Why were BZ ever suspected?
Were all the top pairs investigated so thoroughly?

It would be good to hear from the investigators.

BZ were never suspect in the same way that Fisher-Schwartz were. If it is because of their success at short suit leads against notrump contracts then I think the hands and the bidding should be made available to all bridge players, frankly, all pairs that have a high ‘strike rate’ on such a list should be presented.

We have ‘fingerprint’ evidence with F/S and F/N. The majority of criminal cases are decided on circumstantial evidence. The placing of the cards on the bidding tray is a good example, consistent with too few variables. Is it enough to convict? Should the bar for conviction be set above that of a criminal court? I think not. The integrity of the game is essential to its survival, for it to continue the world's best players will have to be actively ethical.
Feb. 22
John Wilmott edited this comment Feb. 22
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
No one is going to develop a cheating system based on what cards they touch in dummy when defending. To believe such a contention is farcical. Balicki is highly febrile when playing bridge.
Feb. 19
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Robert, do you have compelling evidence to suggest they cheated? I am sure the EBL would be happy to reconsider the verdict if you can present it.
Feb. 16
1 2 3 4 ... 15 16 17 18
.

Bottom Home Top