Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Ken Gamble
1 2 3 4 5 6
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Are you showing 5-5 minors when bidding 1NT-3C and 1NT-3D?
Also, when partner bids 2NT Puppet, how do you show 3S4H and 4S3H hands?
34 minutes ago
Ken Gamble edited this comment 28 minutes ago
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I wish. “He” is my partner. I have not found any articles on this. Does anyone know who Bell is/was?
2 hours ago
Ken Gamble edited this comment an hour ago
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The way he described Bell was: Over 2C Stayman, 2NT = 5-card major min, 3M = 5-card major with max. Others use 3C for 5M and max. I'm sure there are other variations
2 hours ago
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Excellent Doug!
So just having 2 Aces and no tens, one should never invite with 4432 hands (23% making game). Correct?

But KnR is saying two Aces is worth 9 points which is probably invitational to most players. So if one invites, the 16 point notrump partner will accept and we're in a 23% game.

Amazing that taking away the tens and nines will lower the probability from 66% to 23%.

What simulator are you using?
(edited to correct typo)
July 6
Ken Gamble edited this comment July 6
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Actually the simulations I would like to see are:
1. North has 16-17 points so game is bid on every shuffle.
2. South has 8 points with two Aces, 2 four-card suits and no tens.
3. Same with 2 tens.
4. Repeat 1-3 with one or both suits being a major.

I would be interested in how many shuffles produce 9+ tricks in notrump or 10+ tricks in a major.
July 6
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I didn't consider tens and nines which was clearly an error as most are using these cards for their evaluations. My partnership doesn't open 1NT with a 5 card major so I was being a little selfish here.

But I'm very happy with the comments and they will change some of my ideas.
July 6
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Got it! Never used KnR.
July 6
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Yes, that's the simulation I'm referring to. Am I reading the results wrong? I see no cases where he gets up to 9 tricks.
July 6
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Have you noticed the large discrepancy between KnR and Ted's simulations?

Two Aces = 9 tricks for KnR and ~8.1 for the simulations. Seems like a huge difference. Tens and Nines are not included in either.

Anyone else done simulations on this subject? How heavy can we rely on KnR?
July 6
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Thanks Ken,
I saw your post after mine. Seems clear the 9's are important here.
July 6
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Looks like I'm on the losing side of the split personality. However, I recently came across some simulations ran by Ted Muller. If you trust his simulations, then two Aces and two 4-card suits will yield 8.1 tricks on the average.

Having 3 tens will add to the average, but will they add up to 9 tricks?

http://tedmuller.us/Bridge/Simulations/Sim003-RespondingTo15-17Notrump-Part-1.htm
July 6
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Even though it probably won't change any of the arguments above, all 4 hands are presented below. Most commentators had already a pretty good idea what West and South hands were.

N: AK 983 KQ9643 42
S: Q2 6 AJ87 KQT865


E: 96543 AKQ4 void AJ97
W: JT87 JT752 T52 3
July 4
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
By agreement a cuebid is the only forcing action by advancer. Both 2D and 3D can be passed.
July 3
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
East asked South about the 3 bid. Just before his lead, he asked declarer to correct partner's explanation if it was wrong.
July 3
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
East's Hand:

96543
AKQ4
void
AJ97
July 3
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Thanks, I read it again.
April 20
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I was not at the table when this happened. But suppose after a few tricks, the declarer, heavy in concentration, forgot whether he was in a suit or notrump contract.

Of course most of us would gladly tell him, but I don't see anywhere in the laws that forces the defenders to tell him.

I guess the director could force the defenders to tell even though it may not in the laws.
April 20
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Sorry Gordon, I guess I was trying to say that some directors in my club will automatically give the trick penalty to the defenders.
March 11
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Shuffle all effected the decks. Afterwards, the Dealer4 machine can read in the shuffled hands and produce a pbn file. This file can then go through normal post game processing.
Dec. 25, 2017
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
So opener's if 1 call is natural, then 2 would be a limit raise or constructive raise in diamonds? Anyway for making a non-constructive raise in diamonds?
Dec. 13, 2017
1 2 3 4 5 6
.

Bottom Home Top