Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Lars Andersson
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 20 21 22 23
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Rumor has it that the team will be more youthful and “polished”!
March 6
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I think you are confusing the Cavendish with a sporting event. IAF with few boards is essentially a lottery.
Feb. 9
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
A wild guess is that Barry Crane did not do so well when his partners bid and played in an even tempo.
Jan. 13
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
“I doubled 2 which was dangerous with my hand, the auction worked wonderfully so now I make a horrendous 4 cuebid!”
Jan. 12
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Becker-Hayden did compete in the 68 trials for the 69 Bermuda Bowl. Notable absentees were Jordan-Robinson who, as it appears, gave up competitive bridge after the 1968 Olympic finals.
Jan. 7
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Interesting. It also gives a perspective as to why Becker-Hayden would look for hand signals from other pairs.
Jan. 1
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
According to an article in Bridgetidningen (swedish bridge magazine) september 1967 by Tore Sandgren, Becker-Hayden were accused by several US opponents of cheating but they were acquitted by the ACBL after an inquiry.
Jan. 1
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I am sorry, I didn't get that nuance. Arguably, the actual case is complex enough in itself so a hypothetical discussion might prove even more daunting. That never stopped anyone here before though.
Dec. 7, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I fully agree with Michael on these issues almost every time. The consequence, what Jim describes, is that a lot of pros who are good client-handlers would suffer in their income. That is fine with me and for bridge in general.

In the specific case of this deal I disagree with Michael because I place heavy weight on the comment, as did Glubok in his explanation at the table.
Dec. 7, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Congrats! Very deserving
Dec. 6, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
What we have to remember is that top players are competitive, maybe rash and very focused on winning. I don't want to judge how to handle a pressurized situation like this. Looking at it from home and with ample time to consider I find EW were too focused on results. Being in the same situation I can't be sure about my own actions. “Let him withouth sin throw the first stone”, pretty good advice. That said I think the bridge organizations should look at the rules for playing fields of diverse strength and experience. There is no future for only “elite” bridge.
Dec. 5, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Thanks for sharing Giovanni! Looking at the career of Fantoni-Nunes an educated guess is that they started cheating once they were kicked of the Angelini team and replaced by cheaters Buratti-Lanzarotti. They returned as world beaters a few years later. Who coached them to this?
Dec. 4, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
“… intentionally he offered this extra time to his partner …” I think you are way in the wrong to offer this statement. South was just human, surprised that his/hers world class opponent could bid so horribly and tried to figure out if a double asked for a club or diamond lead.
Dec. 4, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Yes, an obvious advantage. Like Zuccelli (or was it the other guy) teaching Fantoni in the national junior team. Similarily to Chiradia going to Brazil to coach.
Dec. 3, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Must be great to be an aspiring italian player and have these guys competing again!
Dec. 3, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
A) beating 7N when 7 is making is a top B) South is not a top pro (as far as i know)
Dec. 3, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Having seen all keycards levin would surely have bid 5N or similar to confirm everything and be able to suggest 7N. That is a conclusion easy to draw playing against him, being a great player has a price that way.
Dec. 3, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Justin Lall wrote that if partner doesn't double he won't lead a diamond. That might be true if playing with another top player, playing with a sponsor that is for sure not relevant. So was the non-doubler a pro, a good player or a sponsor?
Dec. 2, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I think you are missing the point of
a) No D on 4
b) Bobby Levin jumps to 7 hence knowing the partnership has first round control in all suits and his partner doesn't have firstround control in
c) Levin never searched for 7NT despite having so much space
d) The comment
Dec. 1, 2018
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 20 21 22 23
.

Bottom Home Top