Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Michal Czerwonko
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 225 226 227 228
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
This hand is obvious Gerber
4 hours ago
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
If it was easy to teach how to play cards, bridge pros would likely disappear. I would describe learning how to play as read, play, read, play, read, play, play, read, play, play, read, play, play, play, play, read, play, play, play, play, play, … , and so on
7 hours ago
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
A nice combination with 7 is AJ8xx opposite K7x
21 hours ago
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Mike would also score a 0 not divided by another 0 at a calculus 101 test by thusly describing the rule ;-})
April 21
Michal Czerwonko edited this comment April 21
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
1y-1N-P-3N is so uninformative thereby leaving the opp on lead in the dark whether to lead the partner's suit or something else. Second, the idea that 1-1N is NF and may include Michaels doesn't sit well with me. Is there a bid for a big two suiter at all?

I would expect proposing a new, bold approach to include cost-benefit analysis rather than solely how cool is to bid some types of hands.
April 21
Michal Czerwonko edited this comment April 21
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Was I obliged to bid 3 with Kxx,KQxxx,xxx,xx when I mistakenly passed 3?
April 20
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
You must be playing an overcall style I would likely find unexpected. Addendum: both Ambrose and Steve
April 20
Michal Czerwonko edited this comment April 20
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Puppet and Smolen are compatible, with the following answers to 3: 3N=5, 3=No M or 5, and 3/=4
April 20
Michal Czerwonko edited this comment April 20
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Upon a thorough consideration, my best guess is 5 or any bid at the five or higher level by your opponents should be successful to your side provided your X would be for penalties rather than take out. Seriously, you can't play that 2 followed by a new suit could be anything but natural and forcing if the jump to 3Y is fit showing.
April 19
Michal Czerwonko edited this comment April 19
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Also, bidding 3 now implies a decent hand since I didn't bid the cheapest minor first time
April 18
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Are they allowed then to XXX?
April 18
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
3
April 18
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I play 3 as 1RF here
April 18
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
As my final comment, I try a baby psyche after 2 opening or presumed such opening whenever I think my opps are located in the less sophisticated expert territory
April 16
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I don't think we agree what price discrimination is
April 16
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Is price discrimination legal?
April 16
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
If I could describe the organization of my thoughts for some class of problems in some concrete way, that means I'm not fluent in that class of problems. Perhaps trying to anchor your thoughts when you learn something is useful, but once you learn that well, that anchoring disappears. For instance, describe the ‘shapes’ of your thoughts when you drive a car.
April 16
Michal Czerwonko edited this comment April 16
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
You made me wonder what istatistics could be. You may edit your post for quite a while.
April 16
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
In the first case partner super-accepts clubs with values if I sit opposite a bridge player. Do I have enough for 5? I think I'm obliged take it as love for clubs in the second case too.
April 15
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Since there are few cases of polio, no polio vaccinations are necessary
April 15
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 225 226 227 228
.

Bottom Home Top