Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Michal Czerwonko
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Do we know anything about possible shapes for 2?
Oct. 15
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Perhaps a question of style; you went into very serious explanation of a clearly jocular comment, which in my opinion does not improve over such a comment.
Oct. 14
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Robert and Michael (of all people), welcome to non-intermediate forum where sarcasm is often thinly veiled at best. By the way (Robert), pitching diamonds would work as well if not better as more spectacular underruffing.
Oct. 14
Michal Czerwonko edited this comment Oct. 14
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Nobody can see anything unless one has a modicum of agreements
Oct. 14
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
On mps I'm aiming at A/A+ given lack of bidding space
Oct. 14
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Most likely, it's poor bidding either by East or West
Oct. 14
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Why should your approach be free of false positives problem?
Oct. 14
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
That's rather a long description, but I think it captures what bridge may bring to one's life: Be Prepared for Life in the World of Uncertainty, Be Helped in such World by Friends You Make, and Age Graciously
Oct. 13
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Do NS belong to relatively less sophisticated type of experts playing against similar ones?
Oct. 12
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Is JT9 the same number of losers as J42?
Oct. 12
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I prefer TO both hands
Oct. 12
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Perhaps our partner is a serial underbidder, and that's the reason for posting it
Oct. 12
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Unfortunately, my partner will be in that most noble of contracts
Oct. 11
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
It's apparently too obvious
Oct. 11
Michal Czerwonko edited this comment Oct. 11
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Sex, Bridge, Rock'n'Roll
Oct. 11
Michal Czerwonko edited this comment Oct. 11
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
How about poorish hand with M or MM? I don't understand your philosophy: 1 is the softest part of the system for which you compensate by spraying the opps with bidding activity, especially if you often upgrade.
Oct. 11
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Maybe his Sigma is unbounded
Oct. 11
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
…or for 29,750 if they are not cheated out of anything
Oct. 11
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
What do you use 2N for?
Oct. 11
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
In actual hand the vulnerablity is switched, which makes original pass way less appealing
Oct. 10
.

Bottom Home Top