Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Paolo Treossi
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
First hand:
…Hearts were 5-0, and ALL of the other chances for 6NT came in.

I have difficult to understand how ©, (d) and (e) was ALL on!
May 28
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
http://www.rpbridge.net/rpim.htm

May be You are able to convert RBN notation in PBN (I am sure that Richard will supply You also this utilities)
May 22
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I think that to know what means “Pass” over 5 (forcing I think) and which were the means of the alternatives (Dbl, 5) play a role in the decision
May 20
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
@Khokan: Splintered with a BARE honor?
May 20
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Yes. A system “standard” must define what is the “default bid” in a forcing sequence
May 13
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I think that none believe at 3NT but don't change the problem!
May 13
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
When You agreed that 2 is one round force You must agreed also what to do with this hand.
May 13
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Double -> Lead Directing
Delayed Double -> Penalty
Their Suit -> Take-out
Suit -> Natural, strong
Delayed Suit -> Natural, competitive
2NT -> Scramble (two-suit), Strong
Delayed 2NT -> Scramble (two suit), Competitive..
May 5
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
David bid four times a suit with the chicane without opponent bid..
Bramley cue-bid four times opponent suit but at higher level..
Record tied?
March 21
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
8 vs 9
2 vs 15
March 15
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Video was first posted in http://bridgewinners.com/article/view/return-to-sender/ (Mariusz PuczyńSki )
March 11
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Brad have the right idea but the wrong timing…
March 5
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Thanks all for interesting discussion and valuable feedback!
March 5
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Thanks for the remark…
May be South can have some defensive trick but not shape to pull the double… And not strength to bid over 2
March 4
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I know that in a lot of partnership You are right but in that partnership that submit me the hand they have reversed the meaning…
Feb. 23
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The key is not soft value in minors…
Feb. 22
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Sorry…
Feb. 22
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
.

Bottom Home Top