Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Peter Swensson
1 2 3 4
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Amen
June 14
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Both
May 27
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
It don't have to be … if you transfer with 4+cards M when you have invitational values
Jan. 11
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Bruce Evans: from a scientific view a law relates to observations, not explanations, that requires a theory. Whether the theory is correct remains to be seen. When it's correct it's still a theory. You can't reduce physics as you do. LoTT is plain BS, while gravity theories try to describe the observation as correct as possible… and they are damn close.
Jan. 10
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
2 asking for four spade is a better toy
Jan. 9
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Learnt a faster way from a friend. I count the first 4 to 5 cards and if that's ok I can assume that all 13 is correct.
Dec. 12, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
“Australian spotted duck” ?
Nov. 14, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Horrible, open 2kl and miss their game
Oct. 24, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Add a “are you sure” tick box?
Oct. 5, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Right, new techniques will give us other problems

However, bridge will no longer be unique to other “sports”. Referees will get better information. Perfect is just a dream
Aug. 24, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Well, almost all “sports” will end in same situations, when we got videos to the referees … hopefully very soon
Aug. 16, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Please show me a source that prove that the random noise in the power supply is under external control. Sounds like you just are guessing… However, you have pure randomness in the photoelectrical effect as well.
June 21, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Just a thought: haven't checked the literature, but is it possibel to use power supply variation to get radom noise as a source?
June 21, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
6N is the best slam
May 11, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The crucial wording is “might suggest”; BIT don't have to suggest something.

The answer to the question is … no. Even if almost all BIT suggest something.

And on the other hand, IMHO we all have UI on almost every hand
April 29, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Exact … that UI strongly suggest pass.
April 29, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I fully understand that Henrik's comments are according to the law (He is a really good TD); however this is one of the wierd ideas with the law today IMHO.
April 27, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Normal for you?
April 27, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Cool play Per-Ola! My partner found same end play
April 16, 2018
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Thought you like to accuse others for c*? ^^
Jan. 12, 2018
1 2 3 4
.

Bottom Home Top