Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Petter Bengtsson
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 14 15 16 17
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
AKx/Qxxx/xxx/xxx is a limit raise? And an acceptance of a non-serious slam try?
4 hours ago
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
1-3,4
5 hours ago
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I play that opener's pass over the double denies a diamond control. 4 over the double would show a diamond control and a heart control.

After opener's pass responder has a great hand and should bid more than 4.
10 hours ago
Petter Bengtsson edited this comment 10 hours ago
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
It also allows 5NT as asking in spades.
11 hours ago
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Yes, always was an exaggeration. But when they do and find partner's suit, that's not snooping, it's luck.
May 30
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
“LHO led ♠8x shortest suit…”

And you have failed to notice they always lead from short suits against 3NT instead of leading from length/strength?
May 30
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The BBO robots leads are worse than hopeless. When one of their strange leads for once works out great, then they're snooping?
May 30
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
What is Standard if they bid 2 (weak) instead of 1?
May 23
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
That is because 2 was the wrong bid …
May 23
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
“At the table, West responded 2♠ …”

East shows interest in the unbid suits, and West bids his worst suit?
May 19
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
2 is fine.
May 18
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Here, https://bridgewinners.com/article/view/what-is-your-bidding-plan-2-5h8rp7byi6/, the majority thinks K965 KJ AK652 82 should rebid 3. I disagree.

Here the majority, with a similar hand, thinks the rebid should be 2.

I think the voters are affected by the two responding hands.
May 17
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
2 instead of 1.
May 5
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
“3 is a game invite.”

Don't know how to make it more clearer than that…
May 1
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
North is a french robot… ;)
April 27
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
2 followed by 2 or 3 is invitational. A direct 3 is a strong suit with slam interest.
April 25
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
2 is an artificial GF.
2 is weak with s or some invitational hand. Opener always bids 2.
April 25
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Considering how West's openings look like, 1N is not an underbid.
April 19
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Why put dummy below declarer?
March 31
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I think Kantar named it 1430 because that is a well known number in bridge.
March 28
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 14 15 16 17
.

Bottom Home Top