Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Rohit Gupta
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 132 133 134 135
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Yes that figures. After all those headed goals the other PC might not have much left for bridge :)
an hour ago
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Brilliant! Yes!
an hour ago
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Of both?
8 hours ago
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Peter Crouch? Soccer player?
14 hours ago
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
As per Bridge with the Blue Team. Garozzo made the contract, while Belladonna ducked the Q.
Feb. 20
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
You're at an impossible age :)
Feb. 19
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Okay. I thought the declarer could blow up the K while the defence could bury it.
Feb. 19
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Trust is localized, while character helps even at an event horizon. :)
Feb. 19
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
No.
Feb. 18
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
If west saves the K isn't he making 3? A goes away on the K. Okay not always :)
Feb. 18
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
South's hand was: KJX, QJXXXX, xx, Qx

was breaking 3 3
Feb. 17
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The Doubler's hand was: - , K987, K1098, AK10xx
Feb. 17
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
5 X is -500
Feb. 17
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
That too.
Feb. 17
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
No illicit understanding. But if S bids 5 what suit do you want led?
Feb. 17
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Surprisingly all are. Ridiculous.
Feb. 17
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Nothing of great import happened after the 60s in most fields :)
Feb. 16
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I'm looking at that a support X shows 3 card support for partner's suit as well as four cards in the opponents suit. Have your cake and eat it too :)
Feb. 14
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Agreed.
Feb. 13
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Two of my selections haven't made it to the top eight. Bad omen.
Feb. 13
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 132 133 134 135
.

Bottom Home Top