Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Ross Amann
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I am not proposing that Game Forcing is a complete description or all the information to which opponents are entitled. But, if their defense to 2C depends on this, should they both be allowed to ask their screenmate and bid accordingly? If not, they should revise their defense…perhaps they could depend on the 2C strong checkbox on the opponents’ convention cards.

Though I would be very curious if a Director ever penalized a pair for having (slightly) non-matching convention cards.
Aug. 18
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
If the agreement depends on 2C being a “game force”, why don't they both ask the simple Yes/No question? “Game Force? Yes or No?”
Aug. 17
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
K from AK when suit was bid and supported is venerable advice…from Eddie Kantar.
July 18
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Let 1D guarantee four or more. Open 1C with 4-4-3-2. Also when you are comfortable rebidding 1NT, e.g., with 2-3-4-4 over partner’s 1H transfer. Only open 1D when you pmay need a 2C rebid, e.g., with 1-3-4-5 after partner’s 1H transfer.
July 9
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
This question could use another possible answer:

I don’t play relay systems and l will laugh at your Konfusion
July 7
Ross Amann edited this comment July 7
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Exactly. Every match has been close and hard fought…with maybe two exceptions. Who can say which teams are stronger?
June 28
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
If anyone cares, the Kaplan-Rubens evaluator rates these two as 19 and 15.
June 21
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I can see ways to make if South is 1-6-3-3 or 1-6-4-2 or 1-5-4-3 …without using that silly 9H in Dummy. Is there a way to combine all of these?
June 16
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Hell’s angels played all 32 matches: 32*16 and were way up in the Butlers. What a team Norway almost had!
June 16
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
It should be noted that Kit’s version, which .i also play, does not include a strong hand option for the 2D opening. Thus the 2D bid is not forcing; once we ended in 2DXX. I have seen this version called Wagner, as distinct from Multi.

As I understand the ACBL rules, I provide opponents with the multi defense sheets…which are, frankly, not that appropriate for Wagner.
June 12
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Hmm..a new idea!

Going back to my line…after three rounds of Trumps that behave, running the JS gains against QTxx onside and loses to Q stiff offside..
June 10
Ross Amann edited this comment June 10
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
At least ome world-class Declarer ducked a club at trick 2 and went down one when trumps misbeahved.

I prefer taking three rounds of trumps. If they misbeahve, set up spades in three rounds, fingers-crossed, and concede the high trump.

If trumps behave, well see my next post.
June 10
Ross Amann edited this comment June 10
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
This would be an insane agreement if alerted. That would just incite the opponents to double to show spades. It is obviously illegal and worthy of censure.
June 9
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Recently we had a post on DD analysis vs world class players. The result was that DD defenders did .25 tricks per hand better…which is, indeed, the old-timers’ estiamte of the cost of the blind opening lead.

So, aside from that, DD is roughly equal to expert play.
June 2
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
So after partner’s 1S and a 1D overcall, you can bid 1H…and if the “overcall” is changed to 2D, partner is allowed to remember you bid hearts. Hmmm.. is this sequence game forcing? A one round force? Bidding theorists want to know.
April 17
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I alert 1C as 2+ and 1D as 4+.
April 10
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
What is the exact question? Are we playing for 2 diamond tricks? Or three?
April 10
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
And do you consider that pyscher to be ethical?

Do we care how other players view us? Or only about whether we have obeyed the letter of the law?

When partner fails to alert, should we try to alert the opponents without appearing to mislead them?

Ok…everyone thinks I am insane and wants to play bridge against me because I care about both the letter and the appearance.
April 9
Ross Amann edited this comment April 9
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The only solution is to tell them your bid might have had a minor…but then voluntarily say you do not have one on this hand.

Then no one will feel deceived during the play and, if this costs (which is unlikely), it is partner's fault for not alerting.
April 9
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Only one partner for Zlatan: Peter Fredin!!
April 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
.

Bottom Home Top