Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Ross Amann
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
This Claim that a bid is made because someone saw it invites spurious claims, usually by bullies intimidating inexperienced players.

Similarly, Assertions that Declarer played a card because a defender saw it occur too frequently at local clubs and cost the ACBL members.

Have we all forgotten Zero Tolerance?
Oct. 11
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
It took me too long to figure out I was East.
Sept. 24
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Please, I have nothing but the best wishes for H&H. I am proposing a Plan B to keep Fantunes out of US events.

Of less importance:

I have heard that Nickell pays his teammates in full accordance with US laws. He is a class act. I would applaud the good news if I heard that other clients who do so too.

I suspect there may be a rationale to consider these services as delivered entirely outside the US. Please spare me these arguments.
Sept. 23
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Ok. Let’s try another way to skin this cat.

How much have Fantunes been paid for their participation in US events?

Do they apply for US tourist visas? Or for Green Cards?

Are these payments reported to via 1099-Rs? Or they considered bridge instructions delivered in the Cayman Islands?

Are their sponsors liable for violations of US law?

Is there anyway to explore these questions?

Would investigating them deter their entry in US events?

Is this war? Or tiddly-winks?
Sept. 23
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
A simple suggestion.

Could the ACBL request voluntary statements from the 20 or so known bridge sponsors that:

1. They believe their hired teammates are honest
2. Are willing to accept penalties if any of their teammates are disqualified for cheating.

I suggest that the ACBL ask Nick Nickell to darft the first version of this pledge.
Sept. 23
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Has Zimmerman ever apologized for paying them millions of dollars to cheat?

If he has, I will gladly delete,this comment.
Sept. 22
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
When you don’t know what to do, duck.
Sept. 8
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Is there anything wrong with AD, heart ruff, AS, KS, QS then runnig clubs? This makes with trumps 3-2 and clubs 4-2 as well as 4-1 spades with 3-3 clubs. The other candidate lines all seem to have problems with 5-1 clubs.
Sept. 8
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Fantastic stuff….how about how many times they make after L's doubles vs W's?
Aug. 26
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
If Declarer has Ax AT8xxx x JT9x, he makes with double dummy. Perhaps we can threaten a club ruff and, after two,rounds of trumps, take two more and exit with,the KD.
Aug. 21
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I am not proposing that Game Forcing is a complete description or all the information to which opponents are entitled. But, if their defense to 2C depends on this, should they both be allowed to ask their screenmate and bid accordingly? If not, they should revise their defense…perhaps they could depend on the 2C strong checkbox on the opponents’ convention cards.

Though I would be very curious if a Director ever penalized a pair for having (slightly) non-matching convention cards.
Aug. 18
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
If the agreement depends on 2C being a “game force”, why don't they both ask the simple Yes/No question? “Game Force? Yes or No?”
Aug. 17
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
K from AK when suit was bid and supported is venerable advice…from Eddie Kantar.
July 18
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Let 1D guarantee four or more. Open 1C with 4-4-3-2. Also when you are comfortable rebidding 1NT, e.g., with 2-3-4-4 over partner’s 1H transfer. Only open 1D when you pmay need a 2C rebid, e.g., with 1-3-4-5 after partner’s 1H transfer.
July 9
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
This question could use another possible answer:

I don’t play relay systems and l will laugh at your Konfusion
July 7
Ross Amann edited this comment July 7
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Exactly. Every match has been close and hard fought…with maybe two exceptions. Who can say which teams are stronger?
June 28
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
If anyone cares, the Kaplan-Rubens evaluator rates these two as 19 and 15.
June 21
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I can see ways to make if South is 1-6-3-3 or 1-6-4-2 or 1-5-4-3 …without using that silly 9H in Dummy. Is there a way to combine all of these?
June 16
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Hell’s angels played all 32 matches: 32*16 and were way up in the Butlers. What a team Norway almost had!
June 16
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
It should be noted that Kit’s version, which .i also play, does not include a strong hand option for the 2D opening. Thus the 2D bid is not forcing; once we ended in 2DXX. I have seen this version called Wagner, as distinct from Multi.

As I understand the ACBL rules, I provide opponents with the multi defense sheets…which are, frankly, not that appropriate for Wagner.
June 12
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
.

Bottom Home Top