Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Steven Mcgrahan
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 108 109 110 111
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Aaah open a 10-12 1N you are almost a max.
12 hours ago
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Incorrect. Namyats still Basic+ with similar but not exact restrictions
“12. A 3NT opening bid showing a known or unknown solid suit.
13. A 3NT opening bid showing a known or unknown long minor suit.
14. A 4-level opening bid showing at least 6 cards in a different known suit.”
12 hours ago
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Wow!
12 hours ago
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
For Basic+ having your 1 or 1 be “all-purpose” as in GCC is out.

Must be 3+ or quasi-natural ie NT shaped

basic+ not = GCC
14 hours ago
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Why is there an option for red ten's?
I want T!?
15 hours ago
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
3. *** “Quasi-Natural”:

b. Any opening bid at the two-level or higher showing 4 or more cards in the suit bid.
18 hours ago
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
For basic+ 2 has to be very strong to be artificial under GCC it only had to be strong 15+. Your allowed strong 3-suiters for other reasons. But strong artificial bids that don't meet very strong are out.
“Any 2-level or higher opening bid that is Very Strong.” is the culprit which was a late change.
19 hours ago
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
How long would it have taken declarer to play A if nothing happens play K.
This sort pf sloppy claim saves no time and causes delays and hard feelings.
Oct. 17
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Corey-using a phone online or heck just set up 2 accounts and play both hands, the odd results can be detected by the web-site.
Obviously, every instance can't be detected but is someone is doing serious cheating online the web-site has tools to detect possible bad users for monitoring and punishment if caught.
Oct. 17
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The ones you hear about show extras.
When they don't have extras opps are happy with result and you never see the hand again.
Oct. 17
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Yes, If North had withdrawn his card. East could withdraw it's card (which becomes a penalty card)
Oct. 17
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
XX wasn't rude it was dumb. Gave opps a chance.
Oct. 17
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Simple. The model must have ACBL host hotel rate at a very good price and be available.
Oct. 16
Steven Mcgrahan edited this comment Oct. 16
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Your not playing in 1NX ever
The question is are you getting 1100 from 5X
and I doubt it.
Oct. 14
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
correct is cherry picking. I believe I qualified the reference in that manner.
Open yours eyes and look at what is visible.
There is something wrong in head office MS.
Oct. 13
Steven Mcgrahan edited this comment Oct. 14
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Because poster has you being responsible for checking that the opps have a card. Therefore if it turns out they dont have a card the opponents did not do their duty and potentially punished.
The rule posted is not a real rule is clearly ridiculous and was posted to elicit comments.
Oct. 13
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
“Poor executive management, over involved BOD with little current business knowledge.” From the reviews in link above. Sure there is no assurance review is accurate. But spending $375,000 on something that isn't feasible isn't good management.
Oct. 12
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Nice location - to not play bridge!?
Oct. 12
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Talk about Draconian.
The current ACBL rule I believe is you use SAYC until you have 2 complete identical CC's at start of round, with a possible scoring penalty.
Having an innocent bystander have to play SAYC the rest of the game is up there with wet noodles. And if offender isn't noticed until 3rd round you can have two innocent pairs playing SAYC.
Oct. 12
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
You could still use Drury in 4th seat and NEVER open light.
Drury has other advantages.
Oct. 8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 108 109 110 111
.

Bottom Home Top