Join Bridge Winners
All comments by Wayne Burrows
1 2 3 4 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 46 47 48 49
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I do not see the material difference between seeking advice by discussing a case in person and discussing the case publicly. You may get information that you can use to persuade a committee or even get information that encourages you to discontinue your appeal.
July 13
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
1. It is not clear precisely what he has admitted. As far as I can tell he admitted using his phone but it is not public knowledge what he was using it for.

2. His ratings were also artificially inflated because he played weaker tournaments. Apparently there is an anomoly in the rating system where if you beat someone more than 400 rating points lower it is rated as if they were exactly 400 points lower and so he could inflate his rating by playing a lot against much weaker opponents and rarely if ever against similarly rated players.
July 13
$20
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
If I agreed with partner to bid 1 I do so, if I agreed not to then I do not. Otherwise I exercise my discretion and I expect that pretty soon we will have an agreement.
July 13
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
I don't understand the need to rebid 3 with fewer than four diamonds. If there is a need then it should be very rare and diminished even further with the use of modern gadgets like Gazilli variants.
July 12
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Before robots can play bridge against humans there needs to be a way to communicate information about bids and plays from one to the other. That is a long way off and will not be solved by a computer playing against itself.
July 12
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
1. Regulations that limit judgement are misguided at best.

2. In particular regulations that require a person to use hcp to determine whether their judgement is restricted are flawed.

3. There is a huge difference tactically between first seat favourable and various seats unfavourable in what hands you should open.
July 11
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Is 1d 3 or 4 plus?
July 10
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Obviously an advantage. But you better never bid Blackwood with none and here 0 or 3 as you will be in slam off two aces. (Or if hearts are trumps here 1 or 4 and not be able to ask for the trump queen and choose to try and signoff).
July 9
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Kieran the problem might be that partner knows 0/1 are literally impossible but you don't know that he knows. Then when partner bids 5Major you do not know if that is because he knows you have three (or four) and decides that is not enough - some people do decide it is not enough with one missing as much as others think that is illogical - or whether partner is unsure whether you have 0/1 or 3/4. And you have no way of knowing unless partner hesitates before 5Major.
July 9
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Seems reasonable.

However obviously there is a problem if you do not always bid slowly. In general I am willing to accept that the tempo in a slam auction is different than the tempo in many non-slam auctions. The problem occurs when the tempo varies.

When the problem hand occurred the Blackwood responder said her partner would have to check whether one was possible. With his hand opposite her 15-17 one was impossible but he still bid 5S slowly.

It seems to me if he always bids 5S and she always goes on then there is no need for checking unless they have some other unusual agreement like 5H would be a puppet to 5S.

If he bids a slow 5S when he knows they have thirteen on top then he is just creating problems for himself and his partnership. Moreover it seems the only reason for the slowness if she is expected to always bid on is to remind her that she needs to bid on.

That is he has conveyed his information with 4NT that we are definitely going to slam if you have three or four. So after a 5C or 5D response there is no need to think except to make sure partner is awake.
July 9
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
The idea that you should ideally not have two losers in a suit to bid Gerber or Blackwood without knowing partner has a control should be mainstream and not a secret kept by so-called experts.
July 9
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Or he misbid and the hesitation prompted the raise.
July 9
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Then try 4nt.
July 9
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Ridiculous.
July 9
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Sorry I was trying to be generic rather than looking at exceptions or specifics. I agree with Nigel Kearney above that each case should be treated on its own merits.

Nevertheless, it is good to have generalities before looking at specific variations.
July 9
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Summary of my thoughts:

1. Thanks for all of the comments and votes.

2. Sorry for not giving an other category. However, while I realised there were other options, for example Nigel Kearney's response above and differences between 3 or 4 and hearts and spades, I wanted to encourage a dichotomy of responses.

3. There seem to be two schools of thoughts about Blackwood:

i/ Always bid on with 3 or 4

ii/ Asker should always know whether partner has zero or three, or one or four and therefore responder should never bid on.

4. However, there is also a reasonable school of thought that if you are missing one key card (and not the queen of trumps) then you should be bidding slam. That diminishes the problem to when you show four and when hearts (or rather not spades if we extend the situation to some minor agreement auctions) are trumps and responder to Blackwood is missing the trump queen.

5. In another thread https://bridgewinners.com/article/view/carding-dilemma/">Carding Dilemma Richard Pavlicek makes what I consider the astute comment “Slow, deliberate plays like this are made by the masses for one reason: to ensure partner's attention.” Although to be fair there might be times where that is not true and partner has some other problem. But the comment in that thread about the very long time suggests otherwise for that particular case.

Similarly, slow deliberate returns to 5M could easily be used or seen to be used as waking partner up. I will probably write another thread about this from a tournament director's perspective.

6. There is a possible ambiguity when responder cannot tell whether partner has zero or one, or three or four. That problem is solved by the autowood (a new word for me) proponents by always bidding on with the higher number.

7. However then there is a problem when Blackwooder can tell and then bids 5M anyway. I will address and poll this in another article.
July 9
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
Answers should be clear especially to basic questions like this. Having to dig further creates unnecessary problems. Players who repeated do not give full answers should be stamped on (figuratively speaking).
July 9
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
2 a round earlier please
July 9
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
There is no reason to not ask “what are your leads?”
July 9
You are ignoring the author of this comment. Click to temporarily show the comment.
“high quality poll”

After some recent experiences I wonder whether there is such a thing.
July 8
1 2 3 4 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 46 47 48 49
.

Bottom Home Top