Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Andy Anderson

Andy Anderson
Andy Anderson
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 0

Basic Information

Member Since
Aug. 20, 2015
Last Seen
a minute ago
Member Type
Bridge Player
about me

I am an on-line bridge instructor..  both individual clients and group lessons offered..  


Unlike most on-line instructors, I have a fairly full schedule of clients and can supply a good number of clients for referral.


Bridge Information

ACBL Ranking
Emerald Life Master
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
Unscientific ACBL Membership Poll
they want to win ,,,and not are not that interested in improving their game
Unscientific ACBL Membership Poll
I teach on-line and have presently about 18 clients.. for the most part clients wish to learn... however over the years I have lost a lot of clients, who were mostly concerned with results over learning... I gave it a 20% + rating to learning trumps results. Those that wish to ...
I apologize for this question
clarity of question is required here,,,,ACBL rules are simple...if 3+ it is not alertable
Mythbusters: defenses to opening 1NT
Last I looked there were over 100 systems that might be employed over a 1 nt opener.. IMO It would be a simpler to solve the chicken or egg riddle than to determine through evaluation the best method as these 100+ system authors purported have accomplished
Brogeland Wins Lazard Sportsmanship Award
paraphrasing Sir Winston Churchill... "never have so many bridge players owed so much to ..... " Congratulations for your efforts Boye
A question regarding the semi-forcing 1NT
playing forcing nt also makes things easier than semi-forcing
Option to View Hidden Comments
I expect there have been comments blocked such as slanderous, extremely spiteful or vulgar in nature. One might be of the opinion on reading some of them that you would preferred they had been blocked despite having voted against the notion. Not reading them is hardly an option as enquiring ...
A Proposal from World Bridge Productions
Boye B' point is correct.. We do not want "breaking the code" to be the major goal in determining proof of guilt as the cheaters will likely prevail with encryption and the changing of codes. (spy vs spy) Cheaters will need be identified "mathematically" by analyzing data of non-logical actions.

Bottom Home Top