Bridge Winners Profile for Antonio Cocco
Basic Information
- Member Since
- Oct. 4, 2015
- Last Seen
- 13 hours ago
- Member Type
- bridge player
Bridge Information
- ACBL Ranking
- None
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
- FANTONI- NUNES again
- was afraid of that :-(
- Antonio Cocco's bidding problem: QT7 AJ852 AJ Q83
- After 15 answers, pass seems to be the one. What after pass - pass and double by partner?
- Another ruling case
- Let me see if I understood French code A player [b]doit[/b] has the absolute obligation to put his alert on the right place. If he put the alert three centimeters away from the right place, he loses his rights A player [b]peut[/b] may sleep at the ...
- Another ruling case
- "How is North able to place his Alert card on East's as East has not yet posed a bidding card ?" Good question :-) Maybe something is missing in French regulations. Anyway, North said he put the alert on the middle of the tray. "Moreover East didnt asked" If East is ...
- Another ruling case
- Timing EW were pre-alerted when they arrived at the table, They confirm this later When playing the [b]second[/b] board 1- [b]1NT is alerted by North[/b]. North opened 1NT and alerted. East did not ask, 1NT was not explained ...rest of bidding , then play... At the end ...
- Another ruling case
- “The alert should be posed on the last opponent bid” How many times have you seen this procedure REALLY applied in French competitions?
- What is the correct ruling?
- Was not at the table. Don't know if EW really play 4♣ as preempt. It seems that North assumed 4♣ as preempt. So my questions are: Is it East responsibility to tell North if 4♣ is Forcing or not? If not said, what will North assume ...
- What is the correct ruling?
- @steven The rule exists! In France, in events with screens we have to have TWO CC. I repeat "The rule exists!!". But Conventions Cards are still not popular :-) As an example, on the last selection for French representative (so called Equipe de France B) One of the twelve pairs played ...
- Another ruling case
- Sorry for that. Corrected North and East are on the same side of the screen South and West are on the other side
- What is the correct ruling?
- I'm intrigued. Please can you be more specific about the terms "Agreement Disruption" and "No Solid Agreement"?
See all comments
