Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Bill Shutts

Bill Shutts
Bill Shutts
  • 111
    Following
  • 15
    Followers
  • 10
    Posts
  • 75
    Favorites

Basic Information

Member Since
Aug. 6, 2011
Last Seen
April 11
Member Type
Bridge Player
about me
Chicago and $IMP addict from the '70s in Kansas City and '80s in San Diego. Currently disguised as a systems/software engineer and data maven supporting the USMC and USAF V-22 Osprey Communities. Proud to be the human of Wolfie Amadeus Muttzart AKA Count Barkula (pictured), philosopher - "I bark therefore I am" - and pom in the butt. My philosophy is a good pun is *not* as satisfying as an entry shifting squeeze.
Country
United States of America

Bridge Information

Favorite Bridge Memory
Playing vs. Kaplan-Kay in Spingold
Bridge Accomplishments
Few and Far Between
Regular Bridge Partners
None at Present
BBO Username
OldPalooka
ACBL Ranking
Gold Life Master
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
Rohit Gupta's bidding problem: J82 AT732 62 T43
There appears to be a missing king in this deck.
Disclosure that Limit Raise bid might be based on shape and not HCPs?
Richard, I believe you owe them that 22.5 - 25.5 Banzai points translates to an approx range of Work points, e.g., 13.5 - 15. I once proposed Bridgida's Prime Count as a joke on rec.games.bridge. Aces =71, Kings = 47, 31, 17, 7. It fits the ...
Disclosure that Limit Raise bid might be based on shape and not HCPs?
I can certainly appreciate that Richard considers it adequate disclosure, after all, it was sufficient to a goddess:). All you need to do is divide the top and bottom of the announced range by 17.3 to arrive at ~15-17 Work points.
Disclosure that Limit Raise bid might be based on shape and not HCPs?
I personally would be a bit out of sorts if you described this as a limit raise with no amplifying information. I agree that this hand has the approximate playing strength of a prototypical 4 card limit raise, but I feel I am entitled to know your bid could be ...
Gregory Nowak's bidding problem: T9532 J8 3 KJ985
Particularly when the best result from the save will be more than their game.
Finally...
I was misled by your upstream comment about claiming without assuming that East held spades. I was hoping to learn a new magic trick. It seems to me that if East started with 4=2-(5-2) and followed the same discarding strategy, coming down to e.g. J9x -- QTxx J ...
Finally...
Patrick, how does this squeeze work if West guards spades and East guards minors?
Finally...
If East held a five card minor, West would be looking at QJT of the other minor. I suspect this is not the case from the lead and switch, but it is the only clue the spots give us.
Gonzalo Goded's bidding problem: AQ6 A72 QJT643 3
If pass is not forcing (IMHO not, I agree with Jyri's rule) Dbl should be competitive, or pass-Dbl inversion if you prefer.
Bruce Schwaidelson's bidding problem: 9 QJT952 --- AT9865
Us 1 bidders will soon run afoul of the regs (implicit agreement to open 1 with 7HCP) in ACBL land. Give me the PPs, and the ZT suspension for cursing the convention committee for being zealots who insist that Bridge is a game of HCP.
.

Bottom Home Top