Putting aside the IOC history, do you think it's appropriate that teammates of convicted cheaters keep their medals? I understand the argument that they have no reason to believe their teammates were cheating. And yet, surely, they deserve the trophies and historical recognition less than the runners-up.
Completely unacceptable. And if I were your opponents, I'd harbor suspicions that you wanted a break not because you really wanted to discuss the methods--something you could, and should, briefly do at the table--but because you were getting bad results after their interference and needed to collect yourselves.