Bridge Winners Profile for Daan van der Meij
Basic Information
- Member Since
- Oct. 16, 2013
- Last Seen
- Sept. 20
- Member Type
- Bridge Player
- Country
- Netherlands
Bridge Information
- Favorite Conventions
- Long Spade Jammer
- BBO Username
- daanm
- ACBL Ranking
- None
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
- Meckwell 2!c precision opening structure
- Or ch. 18 http://www.pitt.edu/~timm/BookGameForce.pdf
- Interesting Play in Memphis
- no comment
- Precision Lite
- Hi Phil, The big advantage of Precision are the limited opening bids. I don't know how good or bad the 1C is. It could get worse if I increase the frequency, but I am not shure about that. The Regres system was very succesful in the 70's in ...
- Precision Lite
- I don't need your negative comments, thank you.
- Precision Lite
- I wanted to stay close to the original Precision, but these are probably two improvements. Good suggestions!
- Precision Lite
- Your system is a very aggressive system with the weak NT. Have you had many problems coping with interfering opps after your 1♣ openings? Some others mentioned this weakness of Precision. 14+ HCP occurs in 20% of your hands. On the other hand, interfering is more usefull when you ...
- Precision Lite
- It could be a problem, but the 4-4-0-5 distribution is very rare. I can't remember having seen one.
- Precision Lite
- It's true that the 9-13 HCP limitation is not necessary for preempting. But the 1♦ frequency is 12% thus nebulous. The frequency of the 1♣ opening is also around 12%. I don't think it is a good idea to move some openings from 1♣ to ...
- Precision Lite
- I have looked at Moscito many times. There 1♣ opening is more problematic than mine, because the frequency is 14% and many of those are the 15-16 HCP NT distributions. My 1♣ is unbal when 14-16 HCP, and therefore it's a real suit and less risky to ...
- Precision Lite
- True, but even a good system has a worst part. As written above, it is better than the Moscito 1♣.
See all comments
No followers yet
