Join Bridge Winners

Bridge Winners Profile for Dave Vidaver

Dave Vidaver
Dave Vidaver
  • 31
    Following
  • 2
    Followers
  • 17
    Posts
  • 0
    Favorites

Basic Information

Member Since
Sept. 17, 2013
Last Seen
June 16
Member Type
Bridge Player

Bridge Information

Favorite Bridge Memory
Trick 3
Bridge Accomplishments
Still enjoying the game despite limited skills
Member of Bridge Club(s)
Sacramento Bridge Center
BBO Username
Moron
ACBL Ranking
Diamond Life Master
Sorry, this user has no cards yet.
NABC Entry Fees Increase as of Summer, 2019
Is the running table count being published in the NABC Bulletin?
Dave Vidaver's bidding problem: Jxxx QTxxx Kx xx
Thanks. Partner assumed a better hand, bid game and went down. The opponents can make 5 as the majors split 4-1 and 5-1
Dave Vidaver's bidding problem: Jxxx QTxxx Kx xx
LOL. That's good.
Is there a standard treatment?
Thanks. I appreciate the answer to the question. I wonder why people spend time saying they wouldn't have opened, or insisting that 2NT must mean something that you've explicitly stated it doesn't (playing with a partner for the first time). Cheers.
Is there a standard treatment?
Thanks.
Is there a standard treatment?
You may be right, But I think it is only a reasonable call if 3 is forcing (thus presupposing the answer to the question that I'm interested in).
Is there a standard treatment?
"3 would be forcing but not to game" doesn't seem to allow for Qxx Qxxx K(x) Axxx(x) . It would seem to unnecessarily preclude playing in what may be your best spot. Me thinks that the choice is forcing to game or not forcing at all.
Is there a standard treatment?
Thanks it's helpful to get an answer to the question.
What does this bid show?
Steve, I should have put only 1 black K in the hand.
What does this bid show?
Thanks for the input. Option 1 would imply that partner has something that can play 3H opposite a stiff, perhaps Kx QJ1097xx xx Kx
.

Bottom Home Top